AMD Radeon 550 vs AMD FireStream 9170
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 550 and AMD FireStream 9170 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 550
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 38% higher core clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 800 MHz
- 2957.8x more texture fill rate: 37.86 GTexel/s vs 12.8 GTexel / s
- Around 60% higher pipelines: 512 vs 320
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 55 nm
- 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 105 Watt
- Around 9% higher memory clock speed: 1750 MHz, 7 Gbps effective vs 1600 MHz
- 3.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1980 vs 647
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 20 Apr 2017 vs 8 November 2007 |
Core clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 37.86 GTexel/s vs 12.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 512 vs 320 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 55 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 105 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 7 Gbps effective vs 1600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1980 vs 647 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FireStream 9170
- Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 493 vs 457
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 493 vs 457 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 550
GPU 2: AMD FireStream 9170
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon 550 | AMD FireStream 9170 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 457 | 493 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1980 | 647 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon 550 | AMD FireStream 9170 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | TeraScale |
Code name | Lexa | RV670 |
Launch date | 20 Apr 2017 | 8 November 2007 |
Place in performance rating | 292 | 294 |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1183 MHz | |
Compute units | 8 | |
Core clock speed | 1100 MHz | 800 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 55 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 75.71 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1,211 GFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1,211 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 512 | 320 |
Pixel fill rate | 18.93 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 37.86 GTexel/s | 12.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 105 Watt |
Transistor count | 2200 million | 666 million |
Floating-point performance | 512.0 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.0b, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 145 mm, 5.7 inches | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 250 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 10.0 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Shader Model | 6.7 (6.4) | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 56.00 GB/s | 51.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 7 Gbps effective | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |