AMD Radeon 610M (Dragon Range) vs AMD Radeon HD 6450A
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 610M (Dragon Range) and AMD Radeon HD 6450A videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 610M (Dragon Range)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- 3520x more texture fill rate: 17.60 GTexel/s vs 5 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 25 Watt
- Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 265 vs 208
- 4.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1111 vs 260
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 Jan 2023 vs 7 April 2011 |
Texture fill rate | 17.60 GTexel/s vs 5 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 25 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 265 vs 208 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1111 vs 260 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6450A
- Around 56% higher core clock speed: 625 MHz vs 400 MHz
- Around 25% higher pipelines: 160 vs 128
Core clock speed | 625 MHz vs 400 MHz |
Pipelines | 160 vs 128 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 610M (Dragon Range)
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6450A
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon 610M (Dragon Range) | AMD Radeon HD 6450A |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4993 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 265 | 208 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1111 | 260 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon 610M (Dragon Range) | AMD Radeon HD 6450A | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | Dragon Range | Caicos |
Launch date | 3 Jan 2023 | 7 April 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 810 | 807 |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2200 MHz | |
Compute units | 2 | |
Core clock speed | 400 MHz | 625 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 40 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 35.20 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1,126 GFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 563.2 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 128 | 160 |
Pixel fill rate | 8.800 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 17.60 GTexel/s | 5 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 25 Watt |
Floating-point performance | 200 gflops | |
Transistor count | 370 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | System Dependent | 8.53 GB / s |
Memory bus width | System Shared | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | System Shared | 1066 MHz |
Memory type | System Shared | DDR3 |