AMD Radeon 610M (Dragon Range) vs ATI Radeon X800 GTO AGP
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 610M (Dragon Range) and ATI Radeon X800 GTO AGP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 610M (Dragon Range)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 17 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- 3666.7x more texture fill rate: 17.60 GTexel/s vs 4.8 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 110 nm
- 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 49 Watt
- Around 64% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 265 vs 162
- 9.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1103 vs 115
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 Jan 2023 vs 1 October 2005 |
Texture fill rate | 17.60 GTexel/s vs 4.8 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm vs 110 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 49 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 265 vs 162 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1103 vs 115 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 610M (Dragon Range)
GPU 2: ATI Radeon X800 GTO AGP
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon 610M (Dragon Range) | ATI Radeon X800 GTO AGP |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5090 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 265 | 162 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1103 | 115 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon 610M (Dragon Range) | ATI Radeon X800 GTO AGP | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | R400 |
Code name | Dragon Range | R430 |
Launch date | 3 Jan 2023 | 1 October 2005 |
Place in performance rating | 840 | 1067 |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2200 MHz | |
Compute units | 2 | |
Core clock speed | 400 MHz | 400 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 110 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 35.20 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1,126 GFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 563.2 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 128 | |
Pixel fill rate | 8.800 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 17.60 GTexel/s | 4.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 49 Watt |
Transistor count | 160 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | AGP 8x |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x Molex |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 9.0b |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.0 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | System Dependent | 31.36 GB / s |
Memory bus width | System Shared | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | System Shared | 980 MHz |
Memory type | System Shared | GDDR3 |