AMD Radeon 610M (Dragon Range) vs Intel UHD Graphics (Alder Lake 64 EU)
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 610M (Dragon Range) and Intel UHD Graphics (Alder Lake 64 EU) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 610M (Dragon Range)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 0 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 33% higher core clock speed: 400 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 57% higher boost clock speed: 2200 MHz vs 1400 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 10 nm
- 3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 45 Watt
Launch date | 3 Jan 2023 vs 4 Jan 2022 |
Core clock speed | 400 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2200 MHz vs 1400 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm vs 10 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 45 Watt |
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics (Alder Lake 64 EU)
- 2.5x more texture fill rate: 44.80 GTexel/s vs 17.60 GTexel/s
- 4x more pipelines: 512 vs 128
Texture fill rate | 44.80 GTexel/s vs 17.60 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 512 vs 128 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 610M (Dragon Range)
GPU 2: Intel UHD Graphics (Alder Lake 64 EU)
Name | AMD Radeon 610M (Dragon Range) | Intel UHD Graphics (Alder Lake 64 EU) |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5090 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 265 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1103 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon 610M (Dragon Range) | Intel UHD Graphics (Alder Lake 64 EU) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | |
Code name | Dragon Range | |
Launch date | 3 Jan 2023 | 4 Jan 2022 |
Place in performance rating | 840 | not rated |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2200 MHz | 1400 MHz |
Compute units | 2 | 64 |
Core clock speed | 400 MHz | 300 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 10 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 35.20 GFLOPS (1:16) | 358.4 GFLOPS (1:4) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1,126 GFLOPS (2:1) | 2.867 TFLOPS (2:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 563.2 GFLOPS | 1434 GFLOPS |
Pipelines | 128 | 512 |
Pixel fill rate | 8.800 GPixel/s | 22.40 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 17.60 GTexel/s | 44.80 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 45 Watt |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | |
HDCP | ||
Number of simultaneous displays | 3 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | |
Memory bandwidth | System Dependent | |
Memory bus width | System Shared | |
Memory clock speed | System Shared | |
Memory type | System Shared | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode |