AMD Radeon 780M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 780M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 780M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 16% higher core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 1290 MHz
- 2.1x more boost clock speed: 2900 MHz vs 1392 MHz
- 2391.8x more texture fill rate: 139.2 GTexel/s vs 58.2 GTexel / s
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 768 vs 640
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 14 nm
- 5x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 75 Watt
- Around 59% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 27793 vs 17466
- Around 92% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 879 vs 457
- Around 39% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6998 vs 5029
- 3.9x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 480 vs 122
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 4 Jan 2023 vs 25 October 2016 |
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 1290 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2900 MHz vs 1392 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 139.2 GTexel/s vs 58.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 768 vs 640 |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 27793 vs 17466 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 879 vs 457 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6998 vs 5029 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 480 vs 122 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 780M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon 780M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 27793 | 17466 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 879 | 457 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6998 | 5029 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 480 | 122 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 67.209 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 799.414 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.536 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.523 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 223.683 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7043 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3685 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7043 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3685 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon 780M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Pascal |
Code name | Phoenix | GP107 |
Launch date | 4 Jan 2023 | 25 October 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 240 | 586 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $109 | |
Price now | $124.99 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Value for money (0-100) | 56.95 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2900 MHz | 1392 MHz |
Compute units | 12 | |
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz | 1290 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | 640 |
Pixel fill rate | 92.80 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 139.2 GTexel/s | 58.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 75 Watt |
CUDA cores | 640 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,862 gflops | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
Transistor count | 3,300 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, DP 1.4, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Height | 4.38" (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 300 Watt | |
Width | 2-slot | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | System Dependent | 112 GB / s |
Memory bus width | System Shared | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | System Shared | 7008 MHz |
Memory type | System Shared | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
GameStream | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
ShadowWorks | ||
VR Ready |