AMD Radeon 780M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 780M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 780M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 64% higher core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 915 MHz
- 3x more boost clock speed: 2900 MHz vs 980 MHz
- 1358x more texture fill rate: 139.2 GTexel/s vs 102.5 billion / sec
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 28 nm
- 10x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 150 Watt
- Around 81% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 27793 vs 15375
- Around 88% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 879 vs 468
- Around 59% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6998 vs 4413
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 4 Jan 2023 vs 16 August 2012 |
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 915 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2900 MHz vs 980 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 139.2 GTexel/s vs 102.5 billion / sec |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 27793 vs 15375 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 879 vs 468 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6998 vs 4413 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
- Around 75% higher pipelines: 1344 vs 768
- 3.4x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1615 vs 480
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 1344 vs 768 |
Benchmarks | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1615 vs 480 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 780M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon 780M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 27793 | 15375 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 879 | 468 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6998 | 4413 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 480 | 1615 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 36.256 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1029.267 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.037 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 45.894 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 82.191 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3285 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3684 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3337 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3285 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3684 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3337 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon 780M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Phoenix | GK104 |
Launch date | 4 Jan 2023 | 16 August 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 240 | 701 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $299 | |
Price now | $321.99 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Value for money (0-100) | 17.34 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2900 MHz | 980 MHz |
Compute units | 12 | |
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz | 915 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | 1344 |
Pixel fill rate | 92.80 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 139.2 GTexel/s | 102.5 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 150 Watt |
CUDA cores | 1344 | |
Floating-point performance | 2,459.5 gflops | |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | Two 6-pin |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 9.5" (24.1 cm) | |
SLI options | 3-way | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | System Dependent | 144.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | System Shared | 192-bit GDDR5 |
Memory clock speed | System Shared | 6.0 GB/s |
Memory type | System Shared | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA |