AMD Radeon 780M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Max-Q
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 780M and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 780M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 80% higher core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 832 MHz
- 2.5x more boost clock speed: 2900 MHz vs 1155 MHz
- Around 88% higher texture fill rate: 139.2 GTexel/s vs 73.92 GTexel/s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 8 nm
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 30 Watt
Launch date | 4 Jan 2023 vs 17 Dec 2021 |
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 832 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2900 MHz vs 1155 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 139.2 GTexel/s vs 73.92 GTexel/s |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 8 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 30 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Max-Q
- 2.7x more pipelines: 2048 vs 768
Pipelines | 2048 vs 768 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 780M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Max-Q
Name | AMD Radeon 780M | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Max-Q |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 27793 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 879 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6998 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 480 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon 780M | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Max-Q | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Ampere |
Code name | Phoenix | GA107 |
Launch date | 4 Jan 2023 | 17 Dec 2021 |
Place in performance rating | 240 | not rated |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2900 MHz | 1155 MHz |
Compute units | 12 | |
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz | 832 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 8 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | 2048 |
Pixel fill rate | 92.80 GPixel/s | 36.96 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 139.2 GTexel/s | 73.92 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 30 Watt |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 147.8 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 9.462 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.731 TFLOPS | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Height | 35 mm, 1.4 inches | |
Length | 229 mm, 9 inches | |
Width | 113 mm, 4.4 inches | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.7 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | System Dependent | 96.00 GB/s |
Memory bus width | System Shared | 64 bit |
Memory clock speed | System Shared | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective |
Memory type | System Shared | GDDR6 |