AMD Radeon RX 6400 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6400 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6400
- 2.7x more core clock speed: 1923 MHz vs 712 MHz
- 2.2x more boost clock speed: 2321 MHz vs 1057 MHz
- Around 65% higher texture fill rate: 111.4 GTexel/s vs 67.65 GTexel/s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 8 nm
- Around 42% lower typical power consumption: 53 Watt vs 75 Watt
- Around 33% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective)
- Around 76% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 710 vs 403
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7624 vs 6841
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1923 MHz vs 712 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2321 MHz vs 1057 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 111.4 GTexel/s vs 67.65 GTexel/s |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm vs 8 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 53 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 710 vs 403 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7624 vs 6841 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- 2.7x more pipelines: 2048 vs 768
- Around 38% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 4926 vs 3576
- Around 54% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 50643 vs 32847
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2021 vs 19 Jan 2022 |
Pipelines | 2048 vs 768 |
Benchmarks | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4926 vs 3576 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 50643 vs 32847 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6400
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 6400 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 710 | 403 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7624 | 6841 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3576 | 4926 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 32847 | 50643 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 165.993 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1980.866 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.641 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.641 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 745.481 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15760 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8923 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8045 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15760 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8923 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8045 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 6400 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Ampere |
Code name | Navi 24 | GA107 |
Launch date | 19 Jan 2022 | 2021 |
Place in performance rating | 238 | 241 |
Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2321 MHz | 1057 MHz |
Compute units | 12 | |
Core clock speed | 1923 MHz | 712 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 8 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 222.8 GFLOPS (1:16) | 67.65 GFLOPS (1:64) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 7.130 TFLOPS (2:1) | 4.329 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.565 TFLOPS | 4.329 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 768 | 2048 |
Pixel fill rate | 74.27 GPixel/s | 42.28 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 111.4 GTexel/s | 67.65 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 53 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 5400 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Single-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 250 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Width | IGP | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2 |
OpenCL | 2.2 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 128.0 GB/s | 192 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |