AMD Radeon RX 6400 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6400 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6400
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 20% higher core clock speed: 1923 MHz vs 1607 MHz
- Around 38% higher boost clock speed: 2321 MHz vs 1683 MHz
- 435.5x more texture fill rate: 111.4 GTexel/s vs 255.8 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 16 nm
- 3.4x lower typical power consumption: 53 Watt vs 180 Watt
Launch date | 19 Jan 2022 vs 2 November 2017 |
Core clock speed | 1923 MHz vs 1607 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2321 MHz vs 1683 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 111.4 GTexel/s vs 255.8 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm vs 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 53 Watt vs 180 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
- 3.2x more pipelines: 2432 vs 768
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- 4x more memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective
- Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 876 vs 710
- Around 93% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14687 vs 7624
- Around 90% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 6811 vs 3576
- Around 69% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 55390 vs 32847
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 2432 vs 768 |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz vs 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 876 vs 710 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14687 vs 7624 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6811 vs 3576 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 55390 vs 32847 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6400
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 6400 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 710 | 876 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7624 | 14687 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3576 | 6811 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 32847 | 55390 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 182.11 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1797.792 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.071 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 26.444 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1035.984 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16128 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3638 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3344 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16128 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3638 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3344 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 6400 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Pascal |
Code name | Navi 24 | GP104 |
Launch date | 19 Jan 2022 | 2 November 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 238 | 236 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | |
Price now | $379.99 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Value for money (0-100) | 44.74 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2321 MHz | 1683 MHz |
Compute units | 12 | |
Core clock speed | 1923 MHz | 1607 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 222.8 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 7.130 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.565 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 768 | 2432 |
Pixel fill rate | 74.27 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 111.4 GTexel/s | 255.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 53 Watt | 180 Watt |
Transistor count | 5400 million | 7,200 million |
Floating-point performance | 8,186 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Single-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 250 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 128.0 GB/s | 256.3 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 8008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
VR Ready |