AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 51% higher core clock speed: 2310 MHz vs 1530 MHz
- Around 58% higher boost clock speed: 2815 MHz vs 1785 MHz
- Around 15% higher texture fill rate: 180.2 GTexel/s vs 157.1 GTexel/s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 17% lower typical power consumption: 107 Watt vs 125 Watt
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 812 vs 804
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 19 Jan 2022 vs 29 Oct 2019 |
Core clock speed | 2310 MHz vs 1530 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2815 MHz vs 1785 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 180.2 GTexel/s vs 157.1 GTexel/s |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm vs 12 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 107 Watt vs 125 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 812 vs 804 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
- Around 38% higher pipelines: 1408 vs 1024
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 33% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12712 vs 9583
- Around 29% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 62641 vs 48727
- 5.4x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1278 vs 235
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 1408 vs 1024 |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12712 vs 9583 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 62641 vs 48727 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1278 vs 235 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 812 | 804 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9583 | 12712 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 48727 | 62641 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 235 | 1278 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 187.131 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2548.187 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 15.882 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 117.673 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 901.388 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17812 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17812 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Turing |
Code name | Navi 24 | TU116 |
Launch date | 19 Jan 2022 | 29 Oct 2019 |
Place in performance rating | 216 | 223 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $229 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2815 MHz | 1785 MHz |
Compute units | 16 | |
Core clock speed | 2310 MHz | 1530 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 360.3 GFLOPS (1:16) | 157.1 GFLOPS (1:32) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 11.53 TFLOPS (2:1) | 10.05 TFLOPS (2:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.765 TFLOPS | 5.027 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 1024 | 1408 |
Pixel fill rate | 90.08 GPixel/s | 85.68 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 180.2 GTexel/s | 157.1 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 107 Watt | 125 Watt |
Transistor count | 5400 million | 6600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 300 Watt | 350 Watt |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 1x 8-pin |
Length | 9 inches (229 mm) | |
Width | Dual-slot | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 2.2 | 1.2 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 6 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 143.9 GB/s | 336.0 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 192 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2248 MHz, 18 Gbps effective | |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |