NVIDIA Quadro M500M vs AMD FirePro M4150
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M500M and AMD FirePro M4150 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M500M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 44% higher core clock speed: 1029 MHz vs 715 MHz
- Around 5% higher texture fill rate: 17.98 GTexel / s vs 17.16 GTexel / s
- Around 57% better floating-point performance: 863.2 gflops vs 549.1 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1171 vs 995
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 181 vs 171
- Around 58% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6099 vs 3862
- Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2174 vs 1764
- Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2174 vs 1764
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 27 April 2016 vs 16 October 2013 |
| Core clock speed | 1029 MHz vs 715 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 17.98 GTexel / s vs 17.16 GTexel / s |
| Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops vs 549.1 gflops |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1171 vs 995 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 181 vs 171 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6099 vs 3862 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2174 vs 1764 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2174 vs 1764 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro M4150
- 2.2x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2181 vs 1729
- Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2181 vs 1729
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3354 vs 3122
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3354 vs 3122
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2181 vs 1729 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2181 vs 1729 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 vs 3122 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 vs 3122 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M500M
GPU 2: AMD FirePro M4150
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro M500M | AMD FirePro M4150 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1171 | 995 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 181 | 171 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6099 | 3862 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2174 | 1764 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2174 | 1764 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1729 | 2181 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1729 | 2181 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3122 | 3354 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3122 | 3354 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro M500M | AMD FirePro M4150 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | GM108 | Opal |
| Launch date | 27 April 2016 | 16 October 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 1084 | 1086 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1124 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1029 MHz | 715 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops | 549.1 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
| Texture fill rate | 17.98 GTexel / s | 17.16 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 1,040 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 64 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 4000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| nView Display Management | ||
| Optimus | ||

