AMD FirePro M4150 vs AMD Radeon R7 250
Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro M4150 and AMD Radeon R7 250 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro M4150
- 3.5x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 1150 MHz
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 1150 MHz |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 250
- Around 31% higher texture fill rate: 22.4 GTexel / s vs 17.16 GTexel / s
- Around 31% better floating-point performance: 716.8 gflops vs 549.1 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1072 vs 946
- Around 63% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 289 vs 177
- 2.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7733 vs 3545
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2179 vs 1764
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2179 vs 1764
- Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3170 vs 2181
- Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3170 vs 2181
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 22.4 GTexel / s vs 17.16 GTexel / s |
| Floating-point performance | 716.8 gflops vs 549.1 gflops |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1072 vs 946 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 289 vs 177 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 7733 vs 3545 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2179 vs 1764 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2179 vs 1764 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3170 vs 2181 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3170 vs 2181 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 3354 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 3354 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD FirePro M4150
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 250
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD FirePro M4150 | AMD Radeon R7 250 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 946 | 1072 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 177 | 289 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3545 | 7733 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1764 | 2179 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1764 | 2179 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2181 | 3170 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2181 | 3170 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 | 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 | 3356 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 20.161 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 304.279 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.655 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.046 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 96.934 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD FirePro M4150 | AMD Radeon R7 250 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Opal | Oland |
| Launch date | 16 October 2013 | 8 October 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 1088 | 1089 |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Design | AMD Radeon R7 200 Series | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $89 | |
| Price now | $78.34 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 27.62 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 715 MHz | |
| Floating-point performance | 549.1 gflops | 716.8 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
| Texture fill rate | 17.16 GTexel / s | 22.4 GTexel / s |
| Transistor count | 1,040 million | 1,040 million |
| Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | |
| Stream Processors | 384 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Length | 168 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | N / A | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB / s | 72 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 1150 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 / GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| DDMA audio | ||
| FreeSync | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD FirePro M4150 with others
AMDFirePro M4150 vs
NVIDIAGeForce4 Ti 4200
AMDFirePro M4150 vs
AMDFirePro V5900
AMDFirePro M4150 vs
NVIDIATesla M2050
AMDFirePro M4150 vs
AMDRadeon R7 250
AMDFirePro M4150 vs
AMDRadeon R6 M340DX
AMDFirePro M4150 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M465
