AMD FirePro M4150 vs AMD Radeon R7 250
Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro M4150 and AMD Radeon R7 250 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro M4150
- 3.5x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 1150 MHz
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 1150 MHz |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 250
- Around 31% higher texture fill rate: 22.4 GTexel / s vs 17.16 GTexel / s
- Around 31% better floating-point performance: 716.8 gflops vs 549.1 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1045 vs 987
- Around 65% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 283 vs 171
- 2.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7533 vs 3604
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2179 vs 1764
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2179 vs 1764
- Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3170 vs 2181
- Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3170 vs 2181
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 22.4 GTexel / s vs 17.16 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 716.8 gflops vs 549.1 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1045 vs 987 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 283 vs 171 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7533 vs 3604 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2179 vs 1764 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2179 vs 1764 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3170 vs 2181 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3170 vs 2181 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 3354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 3354 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD FirePro M4150
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 250
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD FirePro M4150 | AMD Radeon R7 250 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 987 | 1045 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 171 | 283 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3604 | 7533 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1764 | 2179 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1764 | 2179 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2181 | 3170 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2181 | 3170 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 | 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 | 3356 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 20.161 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 304.279 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.655 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.046 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 96.934 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD FirePro M4150 | AMD Radeon R7 250 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Opal | Oland |
Launch date | 16 October 2013 | 8 October 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 1097 | 1098 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon R7 200 Series | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $89 | |
Price now | $78.34 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 27.62 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 715 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 549.1 gflops | 716.8 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 17.16 GTexel / s | 22.4 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 1,040 million |
Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | |
Stream Processors | 384 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Length | 168 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | N / A | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB / s | 72 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 1150 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 / GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync |