AMD FirePro M6100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 445M
Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro M6100 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 445M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro M6100
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- 4.9x more texture fill rate: 51.6 GTexel / s vs 10.6 billion / sec
- 5.3x more pipelines: 768 vs 144
- 4.9x better floating-point performance: 1,651 gflops vs 339.8 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 4.4x more memory clock speed: 5500 MHz vs 1250 MHz
- 2.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2152 vs 811
- Around 48% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 300 vs 203
- 4.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 52486 vs 12379
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 16 October 2013 vs 3 September 2010 |
| Texture fill rate | 51.6 GTexel / s vs 10.6 billion / sec |
| Pipelines | 768 vs 144 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,651 gflops vs 339.8 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
| Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz vs 1250 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2152 vs 811 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 300 vs 203 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 52486 vs 12379 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 445M
- Around 10% higher core clock speed: 1180 MHz vs 1075 MHz
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 3 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 82% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3274 vs 1803
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3350 vs 2517
- Around 82% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3274 vs 1803
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3350 vs 2517
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1180 MHz vs 1075 MHz |
| Maximum memory size | 3 GB vs 2 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3274 vs 1803 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 vs 2517 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3274 vs 1803 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 vs 2517 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD FirePro M6100
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 445M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD FirePro M6100 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 445M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2152 | 811 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 300 | 203 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 52486 | 12379 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 39.059 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 750.731 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.395 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 57.283 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 166.915 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4537 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1803 | 3274 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2517 | 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4537 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1803 | 3274 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2517 | 3350 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD FirePro M6100 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 445M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Fermi |
| Code name | Saturn | GF106 |
| Launch date | 16 October 2013 | 3 September 2010 |
| Place in performance rating | 873 | 876 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 1075 MHz | 1180 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,651 gflops | 339.8 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 768 | 144 |
| Texture fill rate | 51.6 GTexel / s | 10.6 billion / sec |
| Transistor count | 2,080 million | 1,170 million |
| CUDA cores | 144 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | large | large |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12 API |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 3 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 88 GB / s | 60.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz | 1250 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DirectCompute | ||
| DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
| Optimus | ||
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD FirePro M6100 with others
AMDFirePro M6100 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 445M
AMDFirePro M6100 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560
AMDFirePro M6100 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 Ti
AMDFirePro M6100 vs
AMDRadeon R9 M380
AMDFirePro M6100 vs
AMDRadeon R9 M375X
AMDFirePro M6100 vs
AMDRadeon RX 550
