AMD Radeon R9 M380 vs AMD FirePro M6100

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M380 and AMD FirePro M6100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M380

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
• 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 28% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2763 vs 2152
• Around 76% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 528 vs 300
• Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 194.051 vs 166.915
• Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2855 vs 2517
• Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2855 vs 2517

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro M6100

• Around 19% higher core clock speed: 1075 MHz vs 900 MHz
• Around 8% higher texture fill rate: 51.6 GTexel / s vs 48 GTexel / s
• Around 7% better floating-point performance: 1,651 gflops vs 1,536 gflops
• 3.7x more memory clock speed: 5500 MHz vs 1500 MHz
• 4.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 52486 vs 12662
• Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 39.059 vs 34.701
• Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 750.731 vs 546.907
• Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.395 vs 2.618
• Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 57.283 vs 48.878
• Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4537 vs 3688
• 3.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1803 vs 536
• Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4537 vs 3688
• 3.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1803 vs 536

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M380
GPU 2: AMD FirePro M6100

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2763 2152
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	528 300
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	12662 52486
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	34.701 39.059
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	546.907 750.731
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.618 3.395
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	48.878 57.283
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	194.051 166.915
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3688 4537
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	536 1803
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2855 2517
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3688 4537
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	536 1803
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2855 2517

Compare specifications (specs)