AMD FirePro M6100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti
Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro M6100 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro M6100
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 16% higher core clock speed: 1075 MHz vs 928 MHz
- Around 16% better floating-point performance: 1,651 gflops vs 1,425 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- 1100x more memory clock speed: 5500 MHz vs 5.4 GB/s
- 6.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 52486 vs 7902
- Around 69% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 39.059 vs 23.168
- Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 750.731 vs 592.345
- Around 59% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.395 vs 2.141
- 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 57.283 vs 28.29
- 3.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 166.915 vs 47.404
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4537 vs 3948
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4537 vs 3948
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 16 October 2013 vs 9 October 2012 |
Core clock speed | 1075 MHz vs 928 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,651 gflops vs 1,425 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz vs 5.4 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 52486 vs 7902 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 39.059 vs 23.168 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 750.731 vs 592.345 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.395 vs 2.141 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 57.283 vs 28.29 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 166.915 vs 47.404 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4537 vs 3948 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4537 vs 3948 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti
- Around 15% higher texture fill rate: 59.2 billion / sec vs 51.6 GTexel / s
- Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2530 vs 2246
- Around 38% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 413 vs 299
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3707 vs 1803
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3335 vs 2517
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3707 vs 1803
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3335 vs 2517
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 59.2 billion / sec vs 51.6 GTexel / s |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2530 vs 2246 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 413 vs 299 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3707 vs 1803 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3335 vs 2517 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3707 vs 1803 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3335 vs 2517 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD FirePro M6100
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD FirePro M6100 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2246 | 2530 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 299 | 413 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 52486 | 7902 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 39.059 | 23.168 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 750.731 | 592.345 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.395 | 2.141 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 57.283 | 28.29 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 166.915 | 47.404 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4537 | 3948 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1803 | 3707 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2517 | 3335 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4537 | 3948 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1803 | 3707 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2517 | 3335 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 881 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD FirePro M6100 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Saturn | GK106 |
Launch date | 16 October 2013 | 9 October 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 858 | 859 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $149 | |
Price now | $169.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 18.72 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1075 MHz | 928 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,651 gflops | 1,425 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | 768 |
Texture fill rate | 51.6 GTexel / s | 59.2 billion / sec |
Transistor count | 2,080 million | 2,540 million |
CUDA cores | 768 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One Mini... |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | One 6-pin |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 88 GB / s | 86.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz | 5.4 GB/s |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AppAcceleration | ||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
TXAA |