AMD FirePro M6100 vs NVIDIA Quadro K510M

Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro M6100 and NVIDIA Quadro K510M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

AMD FirePro M6100

NVIDIA Quadro K510M

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro M6100

Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
Around 27% higher core clock speed: 1075 MHz vs 846 MHz
3.8x more texture fill rate: 51.6 GTexel / s vs 13.54 GTexel / s
4x more pipelines: 768 vs 192
5.1x better floating-point performance: 1,651 gflops vs 324.9 gflops
2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
2.3x more memory clock speed: 5500 MHz vs 2400 MHz
3.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2338 vs 641
4.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4537 vs 1087
4.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4537 vs 1087

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	16 October 2013 vs 23 July 2013
Core clock speed	1075 MHz vs 846 MHz
Texture fill rate	51.6 GTexel / s vs 13.54 GTexel / s
Pipelines	768 vs 192
Floating-point performance	1,651 gflops vs 324.9 gflops
Maximum memory size	2 GB vs 1 GB
Memory clock speed	5500 MHz vs 2400 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	2338 vs 641
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4537 vs 1087
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4537 vs 1087

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K510M

Around 52% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 441 vs 291
Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2012 vs 1803
Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3071 vs 2517
Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2012 vs 1803
Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3071 vs 2517

Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	441 vs 291
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2012 vs 1803
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3071 vs 2517
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2012 vs 1803
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3071 vs 2517

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD FirePro M6100
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K510M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

2338

641

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

291

441

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4537

1087

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1803

2012

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2517

3071

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4537

1087

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1803

2012

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2517

3071

Name	AMD FirePro M6100	NVIDIA Quadro K510M
PassMark - G3D Mark	2338	641
PassMark - G2D Mark	291	441
Geekbench - OpenCL	52486
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	39.059
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	750.731
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	3.395
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	57.283
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	166.915
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4537	1087
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1803	2012
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2517	3071
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4537	1087
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1803	2012
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2517	3071
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	0

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD FirePro M6100	NVIDIA Quadro K510M
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 2.0	Kepler 2.0
Code name	Saturn	GK208
Launch date	16 October 2013	23 July 2013
Place in performance rating	844	845
Type	Mobile workstation	Mobile workstation
Technical info
Core clock speed	1075 MHz	846 MHz
Floating-point performance	1,651 gflops	324.9 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	768	192
Texture fill rate	51.6 GTexel / s	13.54 GTexel / s
Transistor count	2,080 million	1270 Million
Thermal Design Power (TDP)		30 Watt
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Display Port		1.2
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	MXM-A (3.0)
Laptop size	large	medium sized
Supplementary power connectors	None
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_0)	12
OpenGL	4.5	4.5
Shader Model		5
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	1 GB
Memory bandwidth	88 GB / s	19.2 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	5500 MHz	2400 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory	0	0
Technologies
AppAcceleration
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus