AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs AMD FirePro M6100

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 and AMD FirePro M6100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200

• Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• 670.9x more texture fill rate: 34.62 GTexel/s vs 51.6 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2415 vs 2195
• Around 37% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 415 vs 302
• Around 82% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3274 vs 1803
• Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3352 vs 2517
• Around 82% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3274 vs 1803
• Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3352 vs 2517

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro M6100

• Around 16% higher core clock speed: 1075 MHz vs 925 MHz
• Around 38% higher memory clock speed: 5500 MHz vs 4000 MHz
• 3.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 52486 vs 14117
• Around 51% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 39.059 vs 25.896
• Around 54% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 750.731 vs 486.804
• Around 36% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.395 vs 2.503
• Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 57.283 vs 53.111
• Around 66% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 166.915 vs 100.658
• Around 80% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4537 vs 2524
• Around 80% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4537 vs 2524

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
GPU 2: AMD FirePro M6100

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2415 2195
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	415 302
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	14117 52486
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	25.896 39.059
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	486.804 750.731
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.503 3.395
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	53.111 57.283
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	100.658 166.915
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2524 4537
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3274 1803
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3352 2517
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2524 4537
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3274 1803
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3352 2517

Compare specifications (specs)