AMD FirePro M8900 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 230
Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro M8900 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro M8900
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 5% higher core clock speed: 680 MHz vs 650 MHz
- 2.1x more texture fill rate: 32.6 GTexel / s vs 15.6 GTexel / s
- 20x more pipelines: 960 vs 48
- 8.4x better floating-point performance: 1,305.6 gflops vs 156 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 55 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 512 MB
- 2x more memory clock speed: 3600 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- 3.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 18738 vs 6073
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 12 April 2011 vs 12 October 2009 |
Core clock speed | 680 MHz vs 650 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 32.6 GTexel / s vs 15.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 960 vs 48 |
Floating-point performance | 1,305.6 gflops vs 156 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 55 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 18738 vs 6073 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD FirePro M8900
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 230
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | AMD FirePro M8900 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 18738 | 6073 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.529 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 760.858 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.158 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 26.149 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 108.525 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 323 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 70 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3233 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3233 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD FirePro M8900 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Tesla |
Code name | Blackcomb | G94B |
Launch date | 12 April 2011 | 12 October 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 1415 | 1418 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $43.99 | |
Price now | $43.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 13.94 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 680 MHz | 650 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,305.6 gflops | 156 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 960 | 48 |
Texture fill rate | 32.6 GTexel / s | 15.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,700 million | 505 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | n / a | |
Form factor | MXM-B | |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 115 GB / s | 57.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 |