AMD FirePro S4000X vs AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM
Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro S4000X and AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro S4000X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
- Around 99% higher texture fill rate: 31 GTexel / s vs 15.6 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 640 vs 320
- Around 99% better floating-point performance: 992.0 gflops vs 499.2 gflops
- Around 11% lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 50 Watt
- 2.5x more memory clock speed: 4500 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- Around 41% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 19.089 vs 13.569
- 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 478.725 vs 162.886
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.08 vs 1.009
- Around 78% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 34.934 vs 19.668
- Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 92.567 vs 77.819
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 August 2014 vs 1 November 2013 |
Texture fill rate | 31 GTexel / s vs 15.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 640 vs 320 |
Floating-point performance | 992.0 gflops vs 499.2 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 19.089 vs 13.569 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 478.725 vs 162.886 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.08 vs 1.009 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 34.934 vs 19.668 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 92.567 vs 77.819 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM
- Around 1% higher core clock speed: 730 MHz vs 725 MHz
- Around 1% higher boost clock speed: 780 MHz vs 775 MHz
Core clock speed | 730 MHz vs 725 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 780 MHz vs 775 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD FirePro S4000X
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | AMD FirePro S4000X | AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 19.089 | 13.569 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 478.725 | 162.886 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.08 | 1.009 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 34.934 | 19.668 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 92.567 | 77.819 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 540 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 192 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5166 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1119 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1284 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2264 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1119 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1284 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2264 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD FirePro S4000X | AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Venus | Oland |
Launch date | 7 August 2014 | 1 November 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 1408 | 1410 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 775 MHz | 780 MHz |
Core clock speed | 725 MHz | 730 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 992.0 gflops | 499.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 640 | 320 |
Texture fill rate | 31 GTexel / s | 15.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 50 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,500 million | 1,040 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Form factor | MXM-A | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Length | 168 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB / s | 28.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |