AMD FirePro S7100X vs Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro S7100X and Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro S7100X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- 2.4x more core clock speed: 723 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 68% higher texture fill rate: 92.54 GTexel / s vs 55.2 GTexel / s
- 42.7x more pipelines: 2048 vs 48
- 3.4x better floating-point performance: 2,961 gflops vs 883.2 gflops
Launch date | 25 May 2016 vs 5 September 2014 |
Core clock speed | 723 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 92.54 GTexel / s vs 55.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2048 vs 48 |
Floating-point performance | 2,961 gflops vs 883.2 gflops |
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 6.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 100 Watt
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 100 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD FirePro S7100X
GPU 2: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Name | AMD FirePro S7100X | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 64.888 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1283.973 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.781 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 70.708 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 315.677 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1471 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 566 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2475 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2475 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4462 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 958 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 958 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2304 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2304 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD FirePro S7100X | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Generation 8.0 |
Code name | Amethyst | Broadwell GT3e |
Launch date | 25 May 2016 | 5 September 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 795 | 796 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 723 MHz | 300 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2,961 gflops | 883.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 2048 | 48 |
Texture fill rate | 92.54 GTexel / s | 55.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 15 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,000 million | 189 million |
Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x1 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |