AMD FirePro S7150 vs NVIDIA Tesla C2050
Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro S7150 and NVIDIA Tesla C2050 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro S7150
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 83% higher core clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 575 MHz
- 3.7x more texture fill rate: 117.6 GTexel / s vs 32.2 GTexel / s
- 4x more pipelines: 1792 vs 448
- 3.7x better floating-point performance: 3,763 gflops vs 1,030.4 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 59% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 238 Watt
- 2.7x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 3 GB
- Around 67% higher memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 3000 MHz
- Around 28% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 465 vs 362
- 2.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 29623 vs 11024
- Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 27.544 vs 26.055
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 February 2016 vs 25 July 2011 |
Core clock speed | 1050 MHz vs 575 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 117.6 GTexel / s vs 32.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1792 vs 448 |
Floating-point performance | 3,763 gflops vs 1,030.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 238 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 3 GB |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz vs 3000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 465 vs 362 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 29623 vs 11024 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.544 vs 26.055 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla C2050
- Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3176 vs 2727
- Around 58% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 901.157 vs 570.969
- 4.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.99 vs 0.687
- Around 76% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 41.654 vs 23.637
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 5962 vs 4359
- 15.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 9064 vs 583
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 5962 vs 4359
- 15.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 9064 vs 583
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3176 vs 2727 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 901.157 vs 570.969 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.99 vs 0.687 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 41.654 vs 23.637 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5962 vs 4359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 9064 vs 583 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5962 vs 4359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 9064 vs 583 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD FirePro S7150
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla C2050
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD FirePro S7150 | NVIDIA Tesla C2050 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2727 | 3176 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 465 | 362 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 29623 | 11024 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.544 | 26.055 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 570.969 | 901.157 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.687 | 2.99 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 23.637 | 41.654 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6147 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4359 | 5962 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 583 | 9064 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6147 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4359 | 5962 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 583 | 9064 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 89.869 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD FirePro S7150 | NVIDIA Tesla C2050 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Fermi |
Code name | Tonga | GF100 |
Launch date | 1 February 2016 | 25 July 2011 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $2,399 | |
Place in performance rating | 634 | 576 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1050 MHz | 575 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 3,763 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 1792 | 448 |
Texture fill rate | 117.6 GTexel / s | 32.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 238 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,000 million | 3,100 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 241 mm | 248 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 3 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB / s | 144.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 3000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |