AMD FirePro V4900 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9100
Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro V4900 and NVIDIA GeForce 9100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro V4900
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 60% higher core clock speed: 800 MHz vs 500 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 80 nm
- 12.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1006 vs 82
- 9.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 7745 vs 795
- 9.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 7745 vs 795
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 November 2011 vs 17 April 2007 |
Core clock speed | 800 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 80 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1006 vs 82 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7745 vs 795 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 7745 vs 795 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9100
- Around 88% lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 75 Watt
- Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 345 vs 320
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 345 vs 320 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD FirePro V4900
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9100
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD FirePro V4900 | NVIDIA GeForce 9100 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1006 | 82 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 320 | 345 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1927 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.303 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 392.237 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.597 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 17.874 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 72.818 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1747 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3753 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7745 | 795 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1747 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3753 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 7745 | 795 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD FirePro V4900 | NVIDIA GeForce 9100 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Tesla |
Code name | Turks | C78 |
Launch date | 1 November 2011 | 17 April 2007 |
Place in performance rating | 957 | 959 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 800 MHz | 500 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 768.0 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 80 nm |
Pipelines | 480 | |
Texture fill rate | 19.2 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 40 Watt |
Transistor count | 716 million | 210 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCI |
Length | 163 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 64.0 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 |