NVIDIA Tesla K10 vs AMD FirePro V4900
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla K10 and AMD FirePro V4900 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K10
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
- 15.4x more texture fill rate: 2x 95.36 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 19.2 GTexel / s
- 6.4x more pipelines: 2x 1536 vs 480
- 6x better floating-point performance: 2x 2,289 gflops vs 768.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 2x 4 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 25% higher memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 4000 MHz
- 7.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 14029 vs 1927
- 6.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 40.736 vs 6.303
- 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 975.508 vs 392.237
- 5.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.39 vs 0.597
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 May 2012 vs 1 November 2011 |
| Texture fill rate | 2x 95.36 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 19.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2x 1536 vs 480 |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 2,289 gflops vs 768.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 2x 4 GB vs 1 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz vs 4000 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 14029 vs 1927 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 40.736 vs 6.303 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 975.508 vs 392.237 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.39 vs 0.597 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro V4900
- Around 7% higher core clock speed: 800 MHz vs 745 MHz
- 3x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 225 Watt
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3753 vs 3632
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3753 vs 3632
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 7745 vs 3353
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 7745 vs 3353
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 800 MHz vs 745 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 225 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3753 vs 3632 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3753 vs 3632 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7745 vs 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 7745 vs 3353 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla K10
GPU 2: AMD FirePro V4900
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Tesla K10 | AMD FirePro V4900 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 14029 | 1927 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 40.736 | 6.303 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 975.508 | 392.237 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.39 | 0.597 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3632 | 3753 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3632 | 3753 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 7745 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 7745 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1006 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 320 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 17.874 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 72.818 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1747 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1747 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Tesla K10 | AMD FirePro V4900 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale 2 |
| Code name | GK104 | Turks |
| Launch date | 1 May 2012 | 1 November 2011 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $5,099 | |
| Place in performance rating | 956 | 957 |
| Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 2,289 gflops | 768.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 2x 1536 | 480 |
| Texture fill rate | 2x 95.36 GTexel / s billion / sec | 19.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 716 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 272 mm | 163 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2x 4 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 2x 160.0 GB / s | 64.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 2x 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 4000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |