AMD FirePro V4900 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1100
Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro V4900 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 1100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro V4900
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 88% higher core clock speed: 800 MHz vs 425 MHz
- 11.3x more texture fill rate: 19.2 GTexel / s vs 1.7 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 130 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 256 MB
- 6.2x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 650 MHz
- 27.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 990 vs 36
- Around 75% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 312 vs 178
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 November 2011 vs 1 April 2004 |
Core clock speed | 800 MHz vs 425 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 19.2 GTexel / s vs 1.7 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 130 nm |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 256 MB |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 650 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 990 vs 36 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 312 vs 178 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD FirePro V4900
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 1100
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD FirePro V4900 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 1100 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 990 | 36 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 312 | 178 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1928 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.303 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 392.237 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.597 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 17.874 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 72.818 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1747 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3753 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7745 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1747 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3753 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 7745 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD FirePro V4900 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 1100 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Rankine |
Code name | Turks | NV36 A1 |
Launch date | 1 November 2011 | 1 April 2004 |
Place in performance rating | 974 | 977 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $169.75 | |
Price now | $101.25 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 0.44 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 800 MHz | 425 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 768.0 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 130 nm |
Pipelines | 480 | |
Texture fill rate | 19.2 GTexel / s | 1.7 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
Transistor count | 716 million | 82 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | AGP 8x |
Length | 163 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x Molex |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 9.0a |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 1.5 (2.1) |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 64.0 GB / s | 10.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 650 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR2 |