AMD FirePro W4190M vs NVIDIA Quadro K3100M

Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro W4190M and NVIDIA Quadro K3100M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

AMD FirePro W4190M

NVIDIA Quadro K3100M

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W4190M

Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
Around 17% higher core clock speed: 825 MHz vs 706 MHz
Around 25% higher memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 3200 MHz
3.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 23384 vs 6068
Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.417 vs 1.356
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2529 vs 2502
Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3889 vs 2616
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2529 vs 2502
Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3889 vs 2616

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	12 November 2015 vs 23 July 2013
Core clock speed	825 MHz vs 706 MHz
Memory clock speed	4000 MHz vs 3200 MHz
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	23384 vs 6068
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.417 vs 1.356
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2529 vs 2502
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3889 vs 2616
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2529 vs 2502
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3889 vs 2616

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K3100M

2.1x more texture fill rate: 45.18 GTexel / s vs 21.6 GTexel / s
2x more pipelines: 768 vs 384
Around 57% better floating-point performance: 1,084 gflops vs 691.2 gflops
2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
Around 97% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2264 vs 1151
Around 82% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 324 vs 178
Around 50% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 426.305 vs 284.018
2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3721 vs 1704
2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3721 vs 1704

Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate	45.18 GTexel / s vs 21.6 GTexel / s
Pipelines	768 vs 384
Floating-point performance	1,084 gflops vs 691.2 gflops
Maximum memory size	4 GB vs 2 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	2264 vs 1151
PassMark - G2D Mark	324 vs 178
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	426.305 vs 284.018
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	3721 vs 1704
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	3721 vs 1704

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD FirePro W4190M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K3100M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1151

2264

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

178

324

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

23384

6068

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

284.018

426.305

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1.417

1.356

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1704

3721

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2529

2502

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3889

2616

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1704

3721

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2529

2502

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3889

2616

Name	AMD FirePro W4190M	NVIDIA Quadro K3100M
PassMark - G3D Mark	1151	2264
PassMark - G2D Mark	178	324
Geekbench - OpenCL	23384	6068
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	284.018	426.305
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.417	1.356
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1704	3721
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2529	2502
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3889	2616
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1704	3721
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2529	2502
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3889	2616
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		19.239
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		15.251
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		38.135
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		0

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD FirePro W4190M	NVIDIA Quadro K3100M
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Kepler
Code name	Opal	GK104
Launch date	12 November 2015	23 July 2013
Place in performance rating	1073	1074
Type	Mobile workstation	Mobile workstation
Launch price (MSRP)		$1,999
Price now		$1,999
Value for money (0-100)		1.38
Technical info
Boost clock speed	900 MHz
Core clock speed	825 MHz	706 MHz
Floating-point performance	691.2 gflops	1,084 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	384	768
Texture fill rate	21.6 GTexel / s	45.18 GTexel / s
Transistor count	1,040 million	3,540 million
Thermal Design Power (TDP)		75 Watt
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Display Port		1.2
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	MXM-B (3.0)
Laptop size	medium sized	large
Supplementary power connectors	None
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_1)	12
OpenGL	4.5	4.5
Shader Model		5
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	64 GB / s	102.4 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	4000 MHz	3200 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory	0	0
Technologies
AppAcceleration
Enduro
Powerplay
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus