AMD FirePro W4190M vs Intel Iris Graphics 540
Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro W4190M and Intel Iris Graphics 540 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W4190M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
- 2.8x more core clock speed: 825 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 8x more pipelines: 384 vs 48
- 32x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 64 MB
- 3.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 23384 vs 6296
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2529 vs 1237
- Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3889 vs 3158
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2529 vs 1237
- Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3889 vs 3158
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 12 November 2015 vs 1 September 2015 |
| Core clock speed | 825 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 48 |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 64 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 23384 vs 6296 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2529 vs 1237 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3889 vs 3158 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2529 vs 1237 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3889 vs 3158 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Graphics 540
- Around 17% higher boost clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 900 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1262 vs 1150
- Around 81% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 319 vs 176
- Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2308 vs 1704
- Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2308 vs 1704
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz vs 900 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1262 vs 1150 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 319 vs 176 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2308 vs 1704 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2308 vs 1704 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD FirePro W4190M
GPU 2: Intel Iris Graphics 540
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD FirePro W4190M | Intel Iris Graphics 540 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1150 | 1262 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 176 | 319 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 23384 | 6296 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 284.018 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.417 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1704 | 2308 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2529 | 1237 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3889 | 3158 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1704 | 2308 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2529 | 1237 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3889 | 3158 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD FirePro W4190M | Intel Iris Graphics 540 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Generation 9.0 |
| Code name | Opal | Skylake GT3e |
| Launch date | 12 November 2015 | 1 September 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 1057 | 1058 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 900 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 48 |
| Texture fill rate | 21.6 GTexel / s | |
| Transistor count | 1,040 million | 189 million |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 64 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | eDRAM |
| Shared memory | 0 | 1 |
Technologies |
||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| Enduro | ||
| Powerplay | ||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD FirePro W4190M with others
AMDFirePro W4190M vs
NVIDIAGeForce4 MX 420
AMDFirePro W4190M vs
ATIFireGL X1-256
AMDFirePro W4190M vs
NVIDIAQuadro K3100M
AMDFirePro W4190M vs
AMDRadeon R9 M275X
AMDFirePro W4190M vs
IntelIris Graphics 540
AMDFirePro W4190M vs
IntelIris Xe Graphics G7 80EU
