AMD FirePro W5130M vs NVIDIA Tesla M2070
Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro W5130M and NVIDIA Tesla M2070 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W5130M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 57% higher core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 574 MHz
- Around 14% higher pipelines: 512 vs 448
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 28% higher memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 3132 MHz
- Around 86% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 22.588 vs 12.145
- Around 88% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.885 vs 1.005
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2 October 2015 vs 25 July 2011 |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz vs 574 MHz |
Pipelines | 512 vs 448 |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 3132 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.588 vs 12.145 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.885 vs 1.005 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla M2070
- Around 9% higher texture fill rate: 32.2 GTexel / s vs 29.6 GTexel / s
- Around 9% better floating-point performance: 1,030.4 gflops vs 947.2 gflops
- 3x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 80% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 910.236 vs 505.57
- Around 54% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 46.235 vs 30.114
- Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 94.442 vs 89.784
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 32.2 GTexel / s vs 29.6 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops vs 947.2 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 910.236 vs 505.57 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 46.235 vs 30.114 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 94.442 vs 89.784 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD FirePro W5130M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla M2070
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | AMD FirePro W5130M | NVIDIA Tesla M2070 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1410 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 301 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5224 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.588 | 12.145 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 505.57 | 910.236 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.885 | 1.005 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.114 | 46.235 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 89.784 | 94.442 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1879 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2090 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2582 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1879 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2090 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2582 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD FirePro W5130M | NVIDIA Tesla M2070 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Fermi |
Code name | Tropo | GF100 |
Launch date | 2 October 2015 | 25 July 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 1116 | 1322 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $3,099 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 925 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 574 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 947.2 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 448 |
Texture fill rate | 29.6 GTexel / s | 32.2 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 1,500 million | 3,100 million |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Length | 248 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 6 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB / s | 150.3 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 3132 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
Enduro |