NVIDIA GeForce 930MX vs AMD FirePro W5130M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 930MX and AMD FirePro W5130M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 930MX

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
• Around 6% higher core clock speed: 952 MHz vs 900 MHz
• Around 10% higher boost clock speed: 1020 MHz vs 925 MHz
• Around 5% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5494 vs 5224
• Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 23.565 vs 22.588
• Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2053 vs 1879
• Around 71% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3577 vs 2090
• Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 2582
• Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2053 vs 1879
• Around 71% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3577 vs 2090
• Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 2582

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W5130M

• Around 21% higher texture fill rate: 29.6 GTexel / s vs 24.48 GTexel / s
• Around 33% higher pipelines: 512 vs 384
• Around 21% better floating-point performance: 947.2 gflops vs 783.4 gflops
• 2.2x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 1800 MHz
• Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1410 vs 1293
• Around 54% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 301 vs 195
• 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 505.57 vs 165.338
• Around 73% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.885 vs 1.09

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 930MX
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W5130M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1293 1410
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	195 301
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	5494 5224
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	23.565 22.588
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	165.338 505.57
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.09 1.885
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2053 1879
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3577 2090
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 2582
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2053 1879
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3577 2090
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 2582

Compare specifications (specs)