AMD FirePro W5130M vs AMD Radeon R5 M315
Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro W5130M and AMD Radeon R5 M315 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W5130M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
- Around 27% higher texture fill rate: 29.6 GTexel / s vs 23.28 GTexel / s
- Around 60% higher pipelines: 512 vs 320
- Around 27% better floating-point performance: 947.2 gflops vs 745.0 gflops
- 4x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- 3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1410 vs 474
- Around 98% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 301 vs 152
- Around 45% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5198 vs 3573
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1879 vs 780
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1879 vs 780
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2 October 2015 vs 5 May 2015 |
Texture fill rate | 29.6 GTexel / s vs 23.28 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 512 vs 320 |
Floating-point performance | 947.2 gflops vs 745.0 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1410 vs 474 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 301 vs 152 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5198 vs 3573 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1879 vs 780 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1879 vs 780 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 M315
- Around 8% higher core clock speed: 970 MHz vs 900 MHz
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2761 vs 2090
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2761 vs 2090
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 970 MHz vs 900 MHz |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2761 vs 2090 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2761 vs 2090 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD FirePro W5130M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 M315
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD FirePro W5130M | AMD Radeon R5 M315 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1410 | 474 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 301 | 152 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5198 | 3573 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.588 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 505.57 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.885 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.114 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 89.784 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1879 | 780 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2090 | 2761 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2582 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1879 | 780 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2090 | 2761 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2582 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD FirePro W5130M | AMD Radeon R5 M315 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | Tropo | Meso |
Launch date | 2 October 2015 | 5 May 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 1139 | 1140 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon R5 300 Series | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 925 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 970 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 947.2 gflops | 745.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 320 |
Texture fill rate | 29.6 GTexel / s | 23.28 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 1,500 million | 3,100 million |
Compute units | 5 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB / s | 14.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
Enduro | ||
DualGraphics | ||
HD3D | ||
PowerTune | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
ZeroCore |