AMD FirePro W5130M vs AMD Radeon R5 M315

Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro W5130M and AMD Radeon R5 M315 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

AMD FirePro W5130M

AMD Radeon R5 M315

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W5130M

Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
Around 27% higher texture fill rate: 29.6 GTexel / s vs 23.28 GTexel / s
Around 60% higher pipelines: 512 vs 320
Around 27% better floating-point performance: 947.2 gflops vs 745.0 gflops
4x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 1000 MHz
3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1410 vs 474
Around 98% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 301 vs 152
Around 41% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5038 vs 3573
2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1879 vs 780
2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1879 vs 780

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	2 October 2015 vs 5 May 2015
Texture fill rate	29.6 GTexel / s vs 23.28 GTexel / s
Pipelines	512 vs 320
Floating-point performance	947.2 gflops vs 745.0 gflops
Memory clock speed	4000 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	1410 vs 474
PassMark - G2D Mark	301 vs 152
Geekbench - OpenCL	5038 vs 3573
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1879 vs 780
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1879 vs 780

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 M315

Around 8% higher core clock speed: 970 MHz vs 900 MHz
2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2761 vs 2090
Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2761 vs 2090

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	970 MHz vs 900 MHz
Maximum memory size	4 GB vs 2 GB
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2761 vs 2090
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2761 vs 2090

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD FirePro W5130M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 M315

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1410

474

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

301

152

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

5038

3573

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1879

780

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2090

2761

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1879

780

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2090

2761

Name	AMD FirePro W5130M	AMD Radeon R5 M315
PassMark - G3D Mark	1410	474
PassMark - G2D Mark	301	152
Geekbench - OpenCL	5038	3573
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	22.588
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	505.57
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.885
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	30.114
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	89.784
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1879	780
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2090	2761
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2582
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1879	780
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2090	2761
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2582

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD FirePro W5130M	AMD Radeon R5 M315
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 1.0	GCN 3.0
Code name	Tropo	Meso
Launch date	2 October 2015	5 May 2015
Place in performance rating	1139	1140
Type	Mobile workstation	Desktop
Design		AMD Radeon R5 300 Series
Technical info
Boost clock speed	925 MHz
Core clock speed	900 MHz	970 MHz
Floating-point performance	947.2 gflops	745.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	512	320
Texture fill rate	29.6 GTexel / s	23.28 GTexel / s
Transistor count	1,500 million	3,100 million
Compute units		5
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x8
Laptop size	medium sized
Bus support		PCIe 3.0
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_1)	12
OpenGL	4.5	4.4
Vulkan
Mantle
OpenCL		Not Listed
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	64 GB / s	14.4 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	64 bit
Memory clock speed	4000 MHz	1000 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3
Shared memory	0	0
Technologies
AMD Eyefinity
AppAcceleration
Enduro
DualGraphics
HD3D
PowerTune
Switchable graphics
ZeroCore