AMD FirePro W5130M vs AMD Radeon R5 M315
Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro W5130M and AMD Radeon R5 M315 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W5130M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
- Around 27% higher texture fill rate: 29.6 GTexel / s vs 23.28 GTexel / s
- Around 60% higher pipelines: 512 vs 320
- Around 27% better floating-point performance: 947.2 gflops vs 745.0 gflops
- 4x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- 3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1410 vs 474
- Around 81% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 301 vs 166
- Around 46% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5224 vs 3573
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1879 vs 780
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1879 vs 780
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 2 October 2015 vs 5 May 2015 |
| Texture fill rate | 29.6 GTexel / s vs 23.28 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 512 vs 320 |
| Floating-point performance | 947.2 gflops vs 745.0 gflops |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1410 vs 474 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 301 vs 166 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5224 vs 3573 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1879 vs 780 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1879 vs 780 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 M315
- Around 8% higher core clock speed: 970 MHz vs 900 MHz
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2761 vs 2090
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2761 vs 2090
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 970 MHz vs 900 MHz |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2761 vs 2090 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2761 vs 2090 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD FirePro W5130M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 M315
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD FirePro W5130M | AMD Radeon R5 M315 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1410 | 474 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 301 | 166 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5224 | 3573 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.588 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 505.57 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.885 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.114 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 89.784 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1879 | 780 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2090 | 2761 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2582 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1879 | 780 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2090 | 2761 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2582 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD FirePro W5130M | AMD Radeon R5 M315 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 3.0 |
| Code name | Tropo | Meso |
| Launch date | 2 October 2015 | 5 May 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 1116 | 1118 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Design | AMD Radeon R5 300 Series | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 925 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 970 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 947.2 gflops | 745.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 512 | 320 |
| Texture fill rate | 29.6 GTexel / s | 23.28 GTexel / s |
| Transistor count | 1,500 million | 3,100 million |
| Compute units | 5 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | Not Listed | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB / s | 14.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| Enduro | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| HD3D | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Switchable graphics | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD FirePro W5130M with others
AMDFirePro W5130M vs
IntelHD Graphics 6000
AMDFirePro W5130M vs
AMDRadeon R5 M315
AMDFirePro W5130M vs
AMDRadeon R5 330 OEM
AMDFirePro W5130M vs
NVIDIAGeForce 930MX
AMDFirePro W5130M vs
AMDRadeon R7 M440
AMDFirePro W5130M vs
AMDRadeon R5 M420
