AMD FirePro W600 vs NVIDIA Quadro K500M
Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro W600 and NVIDIA Quadro K500M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W600
- Around 76% higher texture fill rate: 24 GTexel / s vs 13.6 GTexel / s
- 2.7x more pipelines: 512 vs 192
- 2.4x better floating-point performance: 768.0 gflops vs 326.4 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- 2.5x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- 3.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1683 vs 480
- 3.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 591 vs 184
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 24 GTexel / s vs 13.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 512 vs 192 |
Floating-point performance | 768.0 gflops vs 326.4 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1683 vs 480 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 591 vs 184 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K500M
- Around 13% higher core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 750 MHz
- 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 75 Watt
Core clock speed | 850 MHz vs 750 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD FirePro W600
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K500M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD FirePro W600 | NVIDIA Quadro K500M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1683 | 480 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 591 | 184 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6205 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 17.708 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 585.463 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.857 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 36.592 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 93.116 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2331 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1555 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3250 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2331 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1555 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3250 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD FirePro W600 | NVIDIA Quadro K500M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Cape Verde | GK107 |
Launch date | 13 June 2012 | 1 June 2012 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $599 | |
Place in performance rating | 904 | 905 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 750 MHz | 850 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 768.0 gflops | 326.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 192 |
Texture fill rate | 24 GTexel / s | 13.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 35 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,500 million | 1,270 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 6x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Length | 163 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB / s | 12.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 / GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 |