AMD FirePro W600 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470M

Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro W600 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W600

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
  • Around 22% higher texture fill rate: 24 GTexel / s vs 19.7 billion / sec
  • Around 78% higher pipelines: 512 vs 288
  • Around 25% better floating-point performance: 768.0 gflops vs 616.3 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
  • Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1536 MB
  • 3.2x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 1250 MHz
  • Around 43% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 591 vs 413
  • 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1555 vs 732
  • 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3250 vs 1112
  • 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1555 vs 732
  • 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3250 vs 1112
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 13 June 2012 vs 3 September 2010
Texture fill rate 24 GTexel / s vs 19.7 billion / sec
Pipelines 512 vs 288
Floating-point performance 768.0 gflops vs 616.3 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 40 nm
Maximum memory size 2 GB vs 1536 MB
Memory clock speed 4000 MHz vs 1250 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 591 vs 413
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1555 vs 732
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3250 vs 1112
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1555 vs 732
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3250 vs 1112

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470M

  • Around 47% higher core clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 750 MHz
  • Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1953 vs 1683
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1100 MHz vs 750 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 1953 vs 1683

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD FirePro W600
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470M

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1683
1953
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
591
413
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1555
732
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3250
1112
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1555
732
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3250
1112
Name AMD FirePro W600 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470M
PassMark - G3D Mark 1683 1953
PassMark - G2D Mark 591 413
Geekbench - OpenCL 6205
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 17.708
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 585.463
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.857
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 36.592
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 93.116
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2331
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1555 732
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3250 1112
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2331
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1555 732
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3250 1112

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD FirePro W600 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470M

Essentials

Architecture GCN 1.0 Fermi
Code name Cape Verde GF104
Launch date 13 June 2012 3 September 2010
Launch price (MSRP) $599
Place in performance rating 904 907
Type Workstation Laptop

Technical info

Core clock speed 750 MHz 1100 MHz
Floating-point performance 768.0 gflops 616.3 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 512 288
Texture fill rate 24 GTexel / s 19.7 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 75 Watt 75 Watt
Transistor count 1,500 million 1,950 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 6x mini-DisplayPort No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 MXM-B (3.0)
Length 163 mm
Supplementary power connectors None None
Laptop size large
SLI options 2-way

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_1) 12 API
OpenGL 4.5 4.5
OpenCL 1.1

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1536 MB
Memory bandwidth 64 GB / s 60.0 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 192 Bit
Memory clock speed 4000 MHz 1250 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Shared memory 0

Technologies

3D Vision
CUDA
SLI