AMD ROG Ally Extreme vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380
Comparative analysis of AMD ROG Ally Extreme and NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD ROG Ally Extreme
- Videocard is newer: launch date 14 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- 3.3x more core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 450 MHz
- 36000x more texture fill rate: 129.6 GTexel/s vs 3.6 GTexel / s
- 48x more pipelines: 768 vs 16
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 65 nm
- Around 13% lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 34 Watt
- 64x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 256 MB
- Around 14% higher memory clock speed: 1600 MHz, 6.4 Gbps effective vs 1400 MHz
Launch date | 13 Jun 2023 vs 30 March 2009 |
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 450 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 129.6 GTexel/s vs 3.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 768 vs 16 |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 65 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 34 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 256 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz, 6.4 Gbps effective vs 1400 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD ROG Ally Extreme
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 380
Name | AMD ROG Ally Extreme | NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 |
---|---|---|
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 468 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 173 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 66 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1230 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1230 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD ROG Ally Extreme | NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Tesla |
Code name | Phoenix | G96 |
Launch date | 13 Jun 2023 | 30 March 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 1568 | 1565 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $129 | |
Price now | $72.50 | |
Type | Workstation | |
Value for money (0-100) | 2.68 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2700 MHz | |
Compute units | 12 | |
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz | 450 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | 16 |
Pixel fill rate | 86.40 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 129.6 GTexel/s | 3.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 34 Watt |
Transistor count | 25390 million | 314 million |
Floating-point performance | 35.2 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x USB Type-C | 2x DVI |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Height | 21 mm, 0.8 inches | |
Length | 280 mm, 11 inches | 198 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Width | 111 mm, 4.4 inches | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 10.0 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 51.20 GB/s | 22.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz, 6.4 Gbps effective | 1400 MHz |
Memory type | LPDDR5 | GDDR3 |