AMD ROG Ally Extreme vs NVIDIA Tesla K80m
Comparative analysis of AMD ROG Ally Extreme and NVIDIA Tesla K80m videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD ROG Ally Extreme
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- 2.7x more core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 562 MHz
- 3.1x more boost clock speed: 2700 MHz vs 876 MHz
- 59.4x more texture fill rate: 129.6 GTexel/s vs 2x 182.2 GTexel / s billion / sec
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 28 nm
- 10x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 300 Watt
Launch date | 13 Jun 2023 vs 17 November 2014 |
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 562 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2700 MHz vs 876 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 129.6 GTexel/s vs 2x 182.2 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 300 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K80m
- 6.5x more pipelines: 2x 2496 vs 768
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 2x 12 GB vs 16 GB
- 3.1x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1600 MHz, 6.4 Gbps effective
Pipelines | 2x 2496 vs 768 |
Maximum memory size | 2x 12 GB vs 16 GB |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 1600 MHz, 6.4 Gbps effective |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD ROG Ally Extreme
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla K80m
Name | AMD ROG Ally Extreme | NVIDIA Tesla K80m |
---|---|---|
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2828 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 18073 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 64.366 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1352.236 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 75.764 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 198.978 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.572 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD ROG Ally Extreme | NVIDIA Tesla K80m | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Kepler 2.0 |
Code name | Phoenix | GK210 |
Launch date | 13 Jun 2023 | 17 November 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 881 | 884 |
Type | Workstation | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2700 MHz | 876 MHz |
Compute units | 12 | |
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz | 562 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | 2x 2496 |
Pixel fill rate | 86.40 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 129.6 GTexel/s | 2x 182.2 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 300 Watt |
Transistor count | 25390 million | 7,080 million |
Floating-point performance | 2x 4,373 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x USB Type-C | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Height | 21 mm, 0.8 inches | |
Length | 280 mm, 11 inches | 267 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
Width | 111 mm, 4.4 inches | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 2x 12 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 51.20 GB/s | 2x 240.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 2x 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz, 6.4 Gbps effective | 5012 MHz |
Memory type | LPDDR5 | GDDR5 |