AMD ROG Ally Extreme vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M

Comparative analysis of AMD ROG Ally Extreme and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD ROG Ally Extreme

• Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 3 month(s) later
• Around 64% higher core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 914 MHz
• 2.4x more boost clock speed: 2700 MHz vs 1124 MHz
• 2882.6x more texture fill rate: 129.6 GTexel/s vs 44.96 GTexel / s
• Around 20% higher pipelines: 768 vs 640
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 28 nm
• 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 75 Watt
• 4x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 4 GB

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M

• Around 56% higher memory clock speed: 1000 or 2500 MHz vs 1600 MHz, 6.4 Gbps effective
• Around 18% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3350 vs 2828

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD ROG Ally Extreme
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score

GPU 1 GPU 2

2828 3350

Compare specifications (specs)