AMD Radeon 520 vs AMD FirePro W2100
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 520 and AMD FirePro W2100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 520
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 63% higher core clock speed: 1030 MHz vs 630 MHz
- Around 51% higher boost clock speed: 1030 MHz vs 680 MHz
- 1514.7x more texture fill rate: 20.60 GTexel/s vs 13.6 GTexel / s
- Around 52% better floating-point performance: 660 GFLOPs vs 435.2 gflops
- 8x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 400 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 2.5x more memory clock speed: 4500 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 865 vs 856
- 7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 26304 vs 3750
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 April 2017 vs 12 August 2014 |
Core clock speed | 1030 MHz vs 630 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1030 MHz vs 680 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 20.60 GTexel/s vs 13.6 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 660 GFLOPs vs 435.2 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 400 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 865 vs 856 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 26304 vs 3750 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 vs 3346 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 vs 3346 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W2100
- Around 55% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 314 vs 203
- Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1494 vs 1182
- Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1494 vs 1182
- Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2329 vs 1242
- Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2329 vs 1242
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 314 vs 203 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1494 vs 1182 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1494 vs 1182 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2329 vs 1242 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2329 vs 1242 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 520
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W2100
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon 520 | AMD FirePro W2100 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 865 | 856 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 203 | 314 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 26304 | 3750 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1182 | 1494 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1182 | 1494 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1242 | 2329 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1242 | 2329 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 3346 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 3346 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.438 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 289.646 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.991 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.794 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 50.338 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1058 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon 520 | AMD FirePro W2100 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Oland | Oland |
Design | Radeon 500 Series | |
GCN generation | 1st Gen | |
Launch date | 18 April 2017 | 12 August 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 1109 | 1185 |
Type | Desktop, Laptop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1030 MHz | 680 MHz |
Compute units | 5 | |
Core clock speed | 1030 MHz | 630 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 660 GFLOPs | 435.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 320 | 320 |
Pixel fill rate | 4.10 GP/s | |
Render output units | 4 | |
Stream Processors | 320 | |
Texture fill rate | 20.60 GTexel/s | 13.6 GTexel / s |
Texture Units | 20 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 400 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 1,040 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 2x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
DisplayPort count | 2 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Form factor | Low Profile / Half Length | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 48 GB/s | 28.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | n / a |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Graphics Core Next (GCN) Architecture | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
DualGraphics | ||
Enduro | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
PowerTune | ||
TressFX | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Powerplay |