AMD Radeon 520 vs NVIDIA Quadro K4100M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 520 and NVIDIA Quadro K4100M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 520

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 8 month(s) later
  • Around 46% higher core clock speed: 1030 MHz vs 706 MHz
  • 303.9x more texture fill rate: 20.60 GTexel/s vs 67.78 GTexel / s
  • 2x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 100 Watt
  • Around 41% higher memory clock speed: 4500 MHz vs 3200 MHz
  • 2.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 26304 vs 9097
  • Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1182 vs 1105
  • Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1182 vs 1105
  • Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3351 vs 3246
  • Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3351 vs 3246
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 18 April 2017 vs 23 July 2013
Core clock speed 1030 MHz vs 706 MHz
Texture fill rate 20.60 GTexel/s vs 67.78 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 50 Watt vs 100 Watt
Memory clock speed 4500 MHz vs 3200 MHz
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 26304 vs 9097
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1182 vs 1105
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1182 vs 1105
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3351 vs 3246
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3351 vs 3246

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K4100M

  • 3.6x more pipelines: 1152 vs 320
  • 2.5x better floating-point performance: 1,627 gflops vs 660 GFLOPs
  • 3.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2736 vs 860
  • Around 57% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 324 vs 206
  • Around 59% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1974 vs 1242
  • Around 59% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1974 vs 1242
Specifications (specs)
Pipelines 1152 vs 320
Floating-point performance 1,627 gflops vs 660 GFLOPs
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 2736 vs 860
PassMark - G2D Mark 324 vs 206
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1974 vs 1242
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1974 vs 1242

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon 520
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K4100M

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
860
2736
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
206
324
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
26304
9097
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1182
1105
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1182
1105
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1242
1974
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1242
1974
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3351
3246
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3351
3246
Name AMD Radeon 520 NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
PassMark - G3D Mark 860 2736
PassMark - G2D Mark 206 324
Geekbench - OpenCL 26304 9097
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1182 1105
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1182 1105
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1242 1974
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1242 1974
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3351 3246
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3351 3246
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 24.487
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 600.985
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 2.281
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 35.452
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 61.984

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon 520 NVIDIA Quadro K4100M

Essentials

Architecture GCN 1.0 Kepler
Code name Oland GK104
Design Radeon 500 Series
GCN generation 1st Gen
Launch date 18 April 2017 23 July 2013
Place in performance rating 1098 1075
Type Desktop, Laptop Mobile workstation
Launch price (MSRP) $1,499
Price now $379.99
Value for money (0-100) 9.50

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1030 MHz
Compute units 5
Core clock speed 1030 MHz 706 MHz
Floating-point performance 660 GFLOPs 1,627 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 320 1152
Pixel fill rate 4.10 GP/s
Render output units 4
Stream Processors 320
Texture fill rate 20.60 GTexel/s 67.78 GTexel / s
Texture Units 20
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 50 Watt 100 Watt
Transistor count 1,040 million 3,540 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA No outputs
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
HDMI
VGA
Display Port 1.2

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x8 MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors None
Laptop size large

API support

DirectX 12 12
OpenCL 2.0
OpenGL 4.5 4.5
Vulkan
Shader Model 5

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 4 GB
Memory bandwidth 48 GB/s 102.4 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 bit 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 4500 MHz 3200 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Shared memory 0 0

Technologies

4K H264 Decode
4K H264 Encode
AMD Graphics Core Next (GCN) Architecture
AMD Radeon™ ReLive
AppAcceleration
DualGraphics
Enduro
H265/HEVC Decode
H265/HEVC Encode
HDMI 4K Support
PowerTune
TressFX
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)
Video Code Engine (VCE)
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus