AMD Radeon 610 Mobile vs Intel HD Graphics 620
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 610 Mobile and Intel HD Graphics 620 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 610 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- 3.4x more core clock speed: 1030 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 817.5x more texture fill rate: 20.60 GTexel/s vs 25.2 GTexel / s
- 13.3x more pipelines: 320 vs 24
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1785 vs 1733
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1785 vs 1733
- Around 26% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5290 vs 4185
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 23 May 2019 vs 30 August 2016 |
| Core clock speed | 1030 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 20.60 GTexel/s vs 25.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 320 vs 24 |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1785 vs 1733 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1785 vs 1733 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5290 vs 4185 |
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 620
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 50 Watt
- 16x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1404 vs 1072
- Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1404 vs 1072
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3340 vs 2859
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3340 vs 2859
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 50 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 2 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1404 vs 1072 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1404 vs 1072 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 vs 2859 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 vs 2859 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 610 Mobile
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 620
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon 610 Mobile | Intel HD Graphics 620 |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1072 | 1404 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1072 | 1404 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1785 | 1733 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1785 | 1733 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2859 | 3340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2859 | 3340 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5290 | 4185 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 927 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 218 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 24.275 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 227.879 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.508 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.582 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 30.288 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 343 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon 610 Mobile | Intel HD Graphics 620 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Generation 9.5 |
| Code name | Sea Islands | Kaby Lake GT2 |
| Launch date | 23 May 2019 | 30 August 2016 |
| Place in performance rating | 1333 | 1334 |
| Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
| Compute units | 5 | |
| Core clock speed | 1030 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 41.20 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 659.2 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 320 | 24 |
| Pixel fill rate | 8.240 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 20.60 GTexel/s | 25.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Transistor count | 690 million | 189 million |
| Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | |
| Floating-point performance | 403.2 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Width | IGP | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 32 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 36 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1125 MHz (4500 MHz effective) | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / LPDDR4 |
| Shared memory | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon 610 Mobile with others
AMDRadeon 610 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7900 GTX
AMDRadeon 610 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce 8800 GTS 512
AMDRadeon 610 Mobile vs
ATIRadeon HD 4870
AMDRadeon 610 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon HD 8570D
AMDRadeon 610 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon HD 8450G
AMDRadeon 610 Mobile vs
IntelHD Graphics 620
