AMD Radeon 610 Mobile vs Intel HD Graphics 620
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 610 Mobile and Intel HD Graphics 620 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 610 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- 3.4x more core clock speed: 1030 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 817.5x more texture fill rate: 20.60 GTexel/s vs 25.2 GTexel / s
- 13.3x more pipelines: 320 vs 24
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1785 vs 1733
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1785 vs 1733
- Around 28% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5356 vs 4186
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 23 May 2019 vs 30 August 2016 |
Core clock speed | 1030 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 20.60 GTexel/s vs 25.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 320 vs 24 |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1785 vs 1733 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1785 vs 1733 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5356 vs 4186 |
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 620
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 50 Watt
- 16x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1404 vs 1072
- Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1404 vs 1072
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3340 vs 2859
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3340 vs 2859
Specifications (specs) | |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1404 vs 1072 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1404 vs 1072 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 vs 2859 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 vs 2859 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 610 Mobile
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 620
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon 610 Mobile | Intel HD Graphics 620 |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1072 | 1404 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1072 | 1404 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1785 | 1733 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1785 | 1733 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2859 | 3340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2859 | 3340 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5356 | 4186 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 926 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 218 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 24.275 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 227.879 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.508 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.582 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 30.288 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 343 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon 610 Mobile | Intel HD Graphics 620 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Generation 9.5 |
Code name | Sea Islands | Kaby Lake GT2 |
Launch date | 23 May 2019 | 30 August 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 1333 | 1334 |
Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
Compute units | 5 | |
Core clock speed | 1030 MHz | 300 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 41.20 GFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 659.2 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 320 | 24 |
Pixel fill rate | 8.240 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 20.60 GTexel/s | 25.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 15 Watt |
Transistor count | 690 million | 189 million |
Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 403.2 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Width | IGP | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 32 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 36 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1125 MHz (4500 MHz effective) | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / LPDDR4 |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |