AMD Radeon 630 vs NVIDIA GeForce 825M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 630 and NVIDIA GeForce 825M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.

AMD Radeon 630

NVIDIA GeForce 825M

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 630

Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 3 month(s) later
Around 27% higher core clock speed: 1082 MHz vs 850 MHz
Around 29% higher boost clock speed: 1218 MHz vs 941 MHz
1294.6x more texture fill rate: 38.98 GTexel/s vs 30.11 GTexel / s
Around 33% higher pipelines: 512 vs 384
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
Around 62% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1269 vs 782

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	13 May 2019 vs 27 January 2014
Core clock speed	1082 MHz vs 850 MHz
Boost clock speed	1218 MHz vs 941 MHz
Texture fill rate	38.98 GTexel/s vs 30.11 GTexel / s
Pipelines	512 vs 384
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 28 nm
Maximum memory size	2 GB vs 1 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	1269 vs 782

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 825M

Around 52% lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 50 Watt
Around 3% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective)
Around 64% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 15796 vs 9651
Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 247 vs 221

Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	33 Watt vs 50 Watt
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz vs 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective)
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	15796 vs 9651
PassMark - G2D Mark	247 vs 221

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon 630
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 825M

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

9651

15796

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

221

247

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1269

782

Name	AMD Radeon 630	NVIDIA GeForce 825M
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	3467
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	3467
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3720
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3720
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3361
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3361
Geekbench - OpenCL	9651	15796
PassMark - G2D Mark	221	247
PassMark - G3D Mark	1269	782

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon 630	NVIDIA GeForce 825M
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 4.0	Kepler 2.0
Code name	Polaris 23	GK208
Launch date	13 May 2019	27 January 2014
Place in performance rating	759	790
Type		Laptop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1218 MHz	941 MHz
Compute units	8
Core clock speed	1082 MHz	850 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	77.95 GFLOPS (1:16)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	1247 GFLOPS (1:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	1247 GFLOPS
Pipelines	512	384
Pixel fill rate	19.49 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	38.98 GTexel/s	30.11 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	50 Watt	33 Watt
Transistor count	2200 million	1300 Million
Floating-point performance		722.7 gflops
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort	No outputs
DisplayPort support
HDMI
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x8
Length	5.7 inches (145 mm)
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Width	Dual-slot
Laptop size		medium sized
API support
DirectX	12.0	12.0 (11_0)
OpenCL	2.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.4
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	1 GB
Memory bandwidth	112.0 GB/s	14.4 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective)	1800 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3
Shared memory		0