AMD Radeon 630 vs NVIDIA GRID K520
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 630 and NVIDIA GRID K520 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 630
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 45% higher core clock speed: 1082 MHz vs 745 MHz
- 18.5x more texture fill rate: 38.98 GTexel/s vs 2x 102.0 GTexel / s billion / sec
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 4.5x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 225 Watt
- Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 217 vs 160
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 13 May 2019 vs 23 July 2013 |
| Core clock speed | 1082 MHz vs 745 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 38.98 GTexel/s vs 2x 102.0 GTexel / s billion / sec |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 225 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 vs 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 vs 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 vs 3354 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 vs 3354 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 217 vs 160 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID K520
- 6x more pipelines: 2x 1536 vs 512
- 4x more maximum memory size: 2x 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 2.9x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective)
- Around 96% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6782 vs 3467
- Around 96% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6782 vs 3467
- Around 26% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10864 vs 8605
- 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3516 vs 1435
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 2x 1536 vs 512 |
| Maximum memory size | 2x 4 GB vs 2 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6782 vs 3467 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6782 vs 3467 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 10864 vs 8605 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3516 vs 1435 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 630
GPU 2: NVIDIA GRID K520
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon 630 | NVIDIA GRID K520 |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3467 | 6782 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3467 | 6782 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 | 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 | 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 | 3354 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 | 3354 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8605 | 10864 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 217 | 160 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1435 | 3516 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 20.97 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1063.784 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.244 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 42.277 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 76.158 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon 630 | NVIDIA GRID K520 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | Polaris 23 | GK104 |
| Launch date | 13 May 2019 | 23 July 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 760 | 763 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $3,599 | |
| Type | Workstation | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1218 MHz | |
| Compute units | 8 | |
| Core clock speed | 1082 MHz | 745 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 77.95 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1247 GFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1247 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 512 | 2x 1536 |
| Pixel fill rate | 19.49 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 38.98 GTexel/s | 2x 102.0 GTexel / s billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Transistor count | 2200 million | 3,540 million |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 2,448 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 5.7 inches (145 mm) | 267 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Width | Dual-slot | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2x 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 112.0 GB/s | 2x 160.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 2x 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective) | 5000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon 630 with others
AMDRadeon 630 vs
ATIRadeon X600 SE
AMDRadeon 630 vs
ATIMobility Radeon X1700
AMDRadeon 630 vs
NVIDIATesla C2070
AMDRadeon 630 vs
NVIDIAGRID K520
AMDRadeon 630 vs
AMDRadeon E8950
AMDRadeon 630 vs
AMDRadeon R9 M470
