AMD Radeon 630 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 630 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

AMD Radeon 630

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 630

Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 2 month(s) later
Around 4% higher boost clock speed: 1218 MHz vs 1176 MHz
828.7x more texture fill rate: 38.98 GTexel/s vs 47.04 GTexel / s
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 75 Watt

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	13 May 2019 vs 13 March 2015
Boost clock speed	1218 MHz vs 1176 MHz
Texture fill rate	38.98 GTexel/s vs 47.04 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	50 Watt vs 75 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3720 vs 3714
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3720 vs 3714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3361 vs 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3361 vs 3358

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M

Around 1% higher core clock speed: 1096 MHz vs 1082 MHz
Around 25% higher pipelines: 640 vs 512
2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
Around 43% higher memory clock speed: 2500 MHz vs 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective)
Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5264 vs 3467
Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5264 vs 3467
Around 28% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10999 vs 8605
Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 245 vs 222
2.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3366 vs 1512

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	1096 MHz vs 1082 MHz
Pipelines	640 vs 512
Maximum memory size	4 GB vs 2 GB
Memory clock speed	2500 MHz vs 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective)
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	5264 vs 3467
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	5264 vs 3467
Geekbench - OpenCL	10999 vs 8605
PassMark - G2D Mark	245 vs 222
PassMark - G3D Mark	3366 vs 1512

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon 630
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3467

5264

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3467

5264

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3720

3714

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3720

3714

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3361

3358

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3361

3358

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

8605

10999

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

222

245

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1512

3366

Name	AMD Radeon 630	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	3467	5264
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	3467	5264
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3720	3714
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3720	3714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3361	3358
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3361	3358
Geekbench - OpenCL	8605	10999
PassMark - G2D Mark	222	245
PassMark - G3D Mark	1512	3366
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		54.294
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		795.325
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		3.692
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		51.794
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		174.513
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		1231

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon 630	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 4.0	Maxwell
Code name	Polaris 23	GM107
Launch date	13 May 2019	13 March 2015
Place in performance rating	761	762
Type		Laptop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1218 MHz	1176 MHz
Compute units	8
Core clock speed	1082 MHz	1096 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	77.95 GFLOPS (1:16)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	1247 GFLOPS (1:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	1247 GFLOPS
Pipelines	512	640
Pixel fill rate	19.49 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	38.98 GTexel/s	47.04 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	50 Watt	75 Watt
Transistor count	2200 million	1,870 million
CUDA cores		640
Floating-point performance		1,505 gflops
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort	No outputs
DisplayPort support
HDMI
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support		1
VGA аnalog display support		1
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	MXM-B (3.0)
Length	5.7 inches (145 mm)
Supplementary power connectors	None
Width	Dual-slot
Bus support		PCI Express 3.0
Laptop size		medium sized
API support
DirectX	12.0	12.0 (11_0)
OpenCL	2.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Shader Model	6.4
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	112.0 GB/s	80 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective)	2500 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory		0
Technologies
Adaptive VSync
Ansel
BatteryBoost
CUDA
DSR
GameStream
GameWorks
GeForce Experience
GeForce ShadowPlay
GPU Boost
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
Optimus
SLI