AMD Radeon 630 vs Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 630 and Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 630
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 35% higher core clock speed: 1082 MHz vs 800 MHz
- Around 22% higher boost clock speed: 1218 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3467 vs 2536
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3467 vs 2536
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3720 vs 1586
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3720 vs 1586
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3361 vs 2418
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3361 vs 2418
- Around 51% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8605 vs 5684
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 13 May 2019 vs 5 September 2014 |
| Core clock speed | 1082 MHz vs 800 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1218 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3467 vs 2536 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3467 vs 2536 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 vs 1586 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 vs 1586 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 vs 2418 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 vs 2418 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8605 vs 5684 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300
- 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 50 Watt
- 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 572 vs 224
- Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1596 vs 1514
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 50 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 572 vs 224 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1596 vs 1514 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 630
GPU 2: Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon 630 | Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300 |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3467 | 2536 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3467 | 2536 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 | 1586 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 | 1586 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 | 2418 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 | 2418 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8605 | 5684 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 224 | 572 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1514 | 1596 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon 630 | Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Generation 8.0 |
| Code name | Polaris 23 | Broadwell GT3e |
| Launch date | 13 May 2019 | 5 September 2014 |
| Place in performance rating | 734 | 736 |
| Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1218 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Compute units | 8 | |
| Core clock speed | 1082 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 77.95 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1247 GFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1247 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 512 | |
| Pixel fill rate | 19.49 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 38.98 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Transistor count | 2200 million | 189 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | IGP |
| Length | 5.7 inches (145 mm) | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Width | Dual-slot | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 112.0 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective) | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon 630 with others
AMDRadeon 630 vs
ATIRadeon X700
AMDRadeon 630 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 6100 + nForce 430
AMDRadeon 630 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 880M
AMDRadeon 630 vs
IntelIris Pro Graphics P6300
AMDRadeon 630 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960M
AMDRadeon 630 vs
IntelUHD Graphics 710
