AMD Radeon 630 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 630 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

AMD Radeon 630

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 630

Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 2 month(s) later
Around 13% higher core clock speed: 1082 MHz vs 954 MHz
Around 23% higher boost clock speed: 1218 MHz vs 993 MHz
306.7x more texture fill rate: 38.98 GTexel/s vs 127.1 GTexel / s
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
2.4x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 122 Watt

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	13 May 2019 vs 12 March 2014
Core clock speed	1082 MHz vs 954 MHz
Boost clock speed	1218 MHz vs 993 MHz
Texture fill rate	38.98 GTexel/s vs 127.1 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	50 Watt vs 122 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3720 vs 3718
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3720 vs 3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3361 vs 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3361 vs 3356

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M

3x more pipelines: 1536 vs 512
4x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 2 GB
Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4501 vs 3467
Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4501 vs 3467
Around 75% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 15023 vs 8605
Around 47% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 330 vs 224
2.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3814 vs 1514

Specifications (specs)
Pipelines	1536 vs 512
Maximum memory size	8 GB vs 2 GB
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4501 vs 3467
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4501 vs 3467
Geekbench - OpenCL	15023 vs 8605
PassMark - G2D Mark	330 vs 224
PassMark - G3D Mark	3814 vs 1514

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon 630
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3467

4501

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3467

4501

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3720

3718

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3720

3718

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3361

3356

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3361

3356

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

8605

15023

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

224

330

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1514

3814

Name	AMD Radeon 630	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	3467	4501
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	3467	4501
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3720	3718
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3720	3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3361	3356
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3361	3356
Geekbench - OpenCL	8605	15023
PassMark - G2D Mark	224	330
PassMark - G3D Mark	1514	3814
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		46.273
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		777.677
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		3.914
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		38.196
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		82.511
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		1611

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon 630	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 4.0	Kepler
Code name	Polaris 23	GK104
Launch date	13 May 2019	12 March 2014
Place in performance rating	734	737
Type		Laptop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1218 MHz	993 MHz
Compute units	8
Core clock speed	1082 MHz	954 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	77.95 GFLOPS (1:16)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	1247 GFLOPS (1:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	1247 GFLOPS
Pipelines	512	1536
Pixel fill rate	19.49 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	38.98 GTexel/s	127.1 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	50 Watt	122 Watt
Transistor count	2200 million	3,540 million
CUDA cores		1536
Floating-point performance		3,050 gflops
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort	No outputs
DisplayPort support
HDMI
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support		Up to 3840x2160
eDP 1.2 signal support		Up to 3840x2160
HDCP content protection
LVDS signal support		Up to 1920x1200
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming
VGA аnalog display support		Up to 2048x1536
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	MXM-B (3.0)
Length	5.7 inches (145 mm)
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Width	Dual-slot
Bus support		PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0
Laptop size		large
API support
DirectX	12.0	12.0 (11_0)
OpenCL	2.0	1.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Shader Model	6.4
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	8 GB
Memory bandwidth	112.0 GB/s	160.0 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective)
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory		0
Standard memory configuration		GDDR5
Technologies
3D Blu-Ray
BatteryBoost
CUDA
Direct Compute
FXAA
GeForce Experience
GeForce ShadowPlay
GPU Boost
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
Optimus
SLI
TXAA