AMD Radeon E6465 vs AMD Radeon R9 285

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon E6465 and AMD Radeon R9 285 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

AMD Radeon E6465

AMD Radeon R9 285

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon E6465

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
7.6x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 190 Watt

Launch date	29 September 2015 vs 2 September 2014
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	25 Watt vs 190 Watt

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 285

Around 53% higher core clock speed: 918 MHz vs 600 MHz
21.4x more texture fill rate: 102.8 GTexel / s vs 4.8 GTexel / s
11.2x more pipelines: 1792 vs 160
17.1x better floating-point performance: 3,290 gflops vs 192.0 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
Around 72% higher memory clock speed: 5500 MHz vs 3200 MHz
Around 69% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 597 vs 354
28.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6680 vs 231

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	918 MHz vs 600 MHz
Texture fill rate	102.8 GTexel / s vs 4.8 GTexel / s
Pipelines	1792 vs 160
Floating-point performance	3,290 gflops vs 192.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm vs 40 nm
Memory clock speed	5500 MHz vs 3200 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	597 vs 354
PassMark - G3D Mark	6680 vs 231

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon E6465
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 285

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

354

597

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

231

6680

Name	AMD Radeon E6465	AMD Radeon R9 285
PassMark - G2D Mark	354	597
PassMark - G3D Mark	231	6680
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		72.799
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		1474.632
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		6.369
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		91.954
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		391.399
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)		6474
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)		3043
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)		2782
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)		6474
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)		3043
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)		2782
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		2778

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon E6465	AMD Radeon R9 285
Essentials
Architecture	TeraScale 2	GCN 3.0
Code name	Caicos	Tonga
Launch date	29 September 2015	2 September 2014
Place in performance rating	440	444
Type	Desktop	Desktop
Design		AMD Radeon R9 200 Series
Launch price (MSRP)		$249
Technical info
Core clock speed	600 MHz	918 MHz
Floating-point performance	192.0 gflops	3,290 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	160	1792
Texture fill rate	4.8 GTexel / s	102.8 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	25 Watt	190 Watt
Transistor count	370 million	5,000 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
VGA
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	2x 6-pin
Length		221 mm
API support
DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12
OpenGL	4.4	4.5
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2 GB
Memory bandwidth	25.6 GB / s	176.0 GB / s
Memory bus width	64 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	3200 MHz	5500 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Technologies
HD3D
LiquidVR
TressFX
TrueAudio
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)