AMD Radeon E8950 vs ATI Radeon X800 GTO AGP
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon E8950 and ATI Radeon X800 GTO AGP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon E8950
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 84% higher core clock speed: 735 MHz vs 400 MHz
- 26.7x more texture fill rate: 128.0 GTexel / s vs 4.8 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 110 nm
- 32x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 256 MB
- 6.1x more memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 980 MHz
Launch date | 29 September 2015 vs 1 October 2005 |
Core clock speed | 735 MHz vs 400 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 128.0 GTexel / s vs 4.8 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 110 nm |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 256 MB |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz vs 980 MHz |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon X800 GTO AGP
- Around 94% lower typical power consumption: 49 Watt vs 95 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 49 Watt vs 95 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon E8950
GPU 2: ATI Radeon X800 GTO AGP
Name | AMD Radeon E8950 | ATI Radeon X800 GTO AGP |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 66.837 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1369.722 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.633 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 65.836 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 326.391 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 162 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 115 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon E8950 | ATI Radeon X800 GTO AGP | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | R400 |
Code name | Amethyst | R430 |
Launch date | 29 September 2015 | 1 October 2005 |
Place in performance rating | 734 | 1028 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 735 MHz | 400 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 4,096 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 110 nm |
Pipelines | 2048 | |
Texture fill rate | 128.0 GTexel / s | 4.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 49 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,000 million | 160 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | AGP 8x |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x Molex |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 9.0b |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 2.0 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 192.0 GB / s | 31.36 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 980 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |