AMD Radeon E8950 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon E8950 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon E8950
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- 2.9x more texture fill rate: 128.0 GTexel / s vs 43.9 billion / sec
- 4.3x more pipelines: 2048 vs 480
- 2.9x better floating-point performance: 4,096 gflops vs 1,405.4 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 95 Watt vs 219 Watt
- 6.4x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 1280 MB
- 3.2x more memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 1900 MHz (3800 data rate)
- Around 81% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 66.837 vs 36.849
- Around 86% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1369.722 vs 736.185
- Around 52% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.633 vs 4.369
- Around 64% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 65.836 vs 40.08
- 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 326.391 vs 122.953
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 29 September 2015 vs 7 December 2010 |
Texture fill rate | 128.0 GTexel / s vs 43.9 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 2048 vs 480 |
Floating-point performance | 4,096 gflops vs 1,405.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt vs 219 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 1280 MB |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz vs 1900 MHz (3800 data rate) |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 66.837 vs 36.849 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1369.722 vs 736.185 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.633 vs 4.369 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 65.836 vs 40.08 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 326.391 vs 122.953 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570
- Around 99% higher core clock speed: 1464 MHz vs 735 MHz
Core clock speed | 1464 MHz vs 735 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon E8950
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon E8950 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 66.837 | 36.849 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1369.722 | 736.185 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.633 | 4.369 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 65.836 | 40.08 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 326.391 | 122.953 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3928 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 474 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 13327 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4862 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3668 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3325 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4862 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3668 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3325 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon E8950 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | Amethyst | GF110 |
Launch date | 29 September 2015 | 7 December 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 725 | 727 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $349 | |
Price now | $99.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 48.11 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 735 MHz | 1464 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 4,096 gflops | 1,405.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 2048 | 480 |
Texture fill rate | 128.0 GTexel / s | 43.9 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 219 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,000 million | 3,000 million |
CUDA cores | 480 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, Mini HDMITwo Dual Link DVI |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | Two 6-pin |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 x 16 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
SLI options | 3-way | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.2 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 1280 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 192.0 GB / s | 152.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 320 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 1900 MHz (3800 data rate) |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
SLI | ||
Surround |