AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe vs AMD Radeon HD 8650D IGP
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe and AMD Radeon HD 8650D IGP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 51% higher core clock speed: 1090 MHz vs 720 MHz
- Around 42% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 844 MHz
- 2.8x more texture fill rate: 57.6 GTexel / s vs 20.26 GTexel / s
- 2.3x more pipelines: 896 vs 384
- 3.3x better floating-point performance: 2,150 gflops vs 648.2 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 32 nm
Launch date | 27 September 2016 vs 28 December 2013 |
Core clock speed | 1090 MHz vs 720 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 844 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 57.6 GTexel / s vs 20.26 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 896 vs 384 |
Floating-point performance | 2,150 gflops vs 648.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 32 nm |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8650D IGP
- Around 23% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 80 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 80 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8650D IGP
Name | AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe | AMD Radeon HD 8650D IGP |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 44.281 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 785.276 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.951 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 65.944 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 196.307 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5269 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2344 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5269 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2344 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 396 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 259 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10204 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe | AMD Radeon HD 8650D IGP | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | TeraScale 3 |
Code name | Baffin | Scrapper |
Launch date | 27 September 2016 | 28 December 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 847 | 849 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | 844 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1090 MHz | 720 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2,150 gflops | 648.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 32 nm |
Pipelines | 896 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 57.6 GTexel / s | 20.26 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 65 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | 1,303 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | IGP |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 112.0 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | System Shared |