AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 11 month(s) later
• Around 82% higher core clock speed: 1090 MHz vs 600 MHz
• Around 20% higher texture fill rate: 57.6 GTexel / s vs 48.0 billion / sec
• Around 71% better floating-point performance: 2,150 gflops vs 1,256 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 25% lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 100 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
• 3.9x more memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 1800 MHz
• 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 44.281 vs 18.251
• Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 785.276 vs 665.068
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.951 vs 1.9
• Around 82% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 65.944 vs 36.241
• 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 196.307 vs 62.895
• Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5269 vs 4175
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 3334
• Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5269 vs 4175
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 3334

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX

• Around 7% higher pipelines: 960 vs 896
• Around 44% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3383 vs 2344
• Around 44% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3383 vs 2344

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	44.281 18.251
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	785.276 665.068
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.951 1.9
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	65.944 36.241
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	196.307 62.895
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5269 4175
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2344 3383
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 3334
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5269 4175
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2344 3383
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 3334

Compare specifications (specs)