AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 82% higher core clock speed: 1090 MHz vs 600 MHz
- Around 20% higher texture fill rate: 57.6 GTexel / s vs 48.0 billion / sec
- Around 86% better floating-point performance: 2,150 gflops vs 1,154 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 3 GB
- 5x more memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 1400 MHz
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 44.281 vs 20.831
- Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5269 vs 3396
- Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5269 vs 3396
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 September 2016 vs 1 October 2012 |
Core clock speed | 1090 MHz vs 600 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 57.6 GTexel / s vs 48.0 billion / sec |
Floating-point performance | 2,150 gflops vs 1,154 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 3 GB |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz vs 1400 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 44.281 vs 20.831 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5269 vs 3396 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5269 vs 3396 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3350 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX
- Around 7% higher pipelines: 960 vs 896
- Around 7% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 80 Watt
- Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3698 vs 2344
- Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3698 vs 2344
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 960 vs 896 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 80 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 vs 2344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 vs 2344 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 44.281 | 20.831 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 785.276 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.951 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 65.944 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 196.307 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5269 | 3396 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2344 | 3698 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5269 | 3396 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2344 | 3698 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3350 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1947 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 326 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5980 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Baffin | GK104 |
Launch date | 27 September 2016 | 1 October 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 816 | 818 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1090 MHz | 600 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2,150 gflops | 1,154 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 896 | 960 |
Texture fill rate | 57.6 GTexel / s | 48.0 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | 3,540 million |
CUDA cores | 960 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
Laptop size | large | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12 API |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 3 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 112.0 GB / s | 67.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 1400 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
FXAA | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA |