AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 11 mois plus tard
- Environ 82% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1090 MHz versus 600 MHz
- Environ 20% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 57.6 GTexel / s versus 48.0 billion / sec
- Environ 71% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,150 gflops versus 1,256 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 25% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 80 Watt versus 100 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 2 GB
- 3.9x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 7000 MHz versus 1800 MHz
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 44.281 versus 18.251
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 785.276 versus 665.068
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.951 versus 1.9
- Environ 82% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 65.944 versus 36.241
- 3.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 196.307 versus 62.895
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5269 versus 4175
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 versus 3334
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5269 versus 4175
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 versus 3334
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 27 September 2016 versus 1 October 2012 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1090 MHz versus 600 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 57.6 GTexel / s versus 48.0 billion / sec |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,150 gflops versus 1,256 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt versus 100 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 2 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 7000 MHz versus 1800 MHz |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 44.281 versus 18.251 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 785.276 versus 665.068 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.951 versus 1.9 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 65.944 versus 36.241 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 196.307 versus 62.895 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5269 versus 4175 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 versus 3334 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5269 versus 4175 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 versus 3334 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX
- Environ 7% de pipelines plus haut: 960 versus 896
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3383 versus 2344
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3383 versus 2344
| Caractéristiques | |
| Pipelines | 960 versus 896 |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3383 versus 2344 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3383 versus 2344 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 44.281 | 18.251 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 785.276 | 665.068 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.951 | 1.9 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 65.944 | 36.241 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 196.307 | 62.895 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5269 | 4175 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2344 | 3383 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3334 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5269 | 4175 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2344 | 3383 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3334 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2745 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 382 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 10780 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Kepler |
| Nom de code | Baffin | GK104 |
| Date de sortie | 27 September 2016 | 1 October 2012 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 815 | 818 |
| Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1200 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1090 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,150 gflops | 1,256 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 896 | 960 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 57.6 GTexel / s | 48.0 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 3,000 million | 3,540 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 960 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0 | |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
| Options SLI | 2-way | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12 API |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 112.0 GB / s | 115.2 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 7000 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
| FXAA | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe avec des autres
AMDRadeon E9260 PCIe vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 675MX
AMDRadeon E9260 PCIe vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 670MX
AMDRadeon E9260 PCIe vs
AMDRadeon HD 7790
AMDRadeon E9260 PCIe vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 11
AMDRadeon E9260 PCIe vs
IntelIris Plus Graphics 645
AMDRadeon E9260 PCIe vs
AMDRadeon Pro WX 3200
