AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 and AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 8 month(s) later
• 601x more texture fill rate: 34.62 GTexel/s vs 57.6 GTexel / s
• Around 23% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 80 Watt
• Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3274 vs 2344
• Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3274 vs 2344

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe

• Around 18% higher core clock speed: 1090 MHz vs 925 MHz
• Around 11% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 1082 MHz
• Around 75% higher memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 4000 MHz
• Around 71% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 44.281 vs 25.896
• Around 61% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 785.276 vs 486.804
• Around 58% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.951 vs 2.503
• Around 24% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 65.944 vs 53.111
• Around 95% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 196.307 vs 100.658
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5269 vs 2524
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5269 vs 2524

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
GPU 2: AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	25.896 44.281
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	486.804 785.276
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.503 3.951
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	53.111 65.944
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	100.658 196.307
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2524 5269
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3274 2344
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3352 3357
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2524 5269
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3274 2344
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3352 3357

Compare specifications (specs)